Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

CN5 - Wearable technology is it the future?

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Clinical Research

Tumour Site

Presenters

Louise Cave

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S1257-S1259. 10.1016/annonc/annonc690

Authors

L. Cave

Author affiliations

  • Digital Services, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, M20 4BX - Manchester/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract CN5

Background

The aim of this research project is to review the current literature on wearable devices to monitor patient vital signs and understand the feasibility of introducing a similar device to a fast paced inpatient haematology ward. Neutropenic sepsis (NS) is recognised as one of the most fatal conditions that can be experienced by a patient undergoing an allogeneic stem cell transplant. NS is time critical with the ideal time to needle being under an hour. The inability to continuously monitor patients when they become septic led to nurses anecdotally reporting higher anxiety for their patients. The definition in acute care is that wearable vital sign monitoring devices may be defined as body- worn technologies that facilitate continuous, real-time vital sign monitoring without the need for nurse-to-patient contact or restrictive leads connecting the patient to wall-mounted or free-standing equipment.

Methods

Table: CN5

Database: Search Terms Inclusion: 2010-2020 English Reviewed Excluded
Medline (wearable devices or wearable technology) AND (vital signs or vital sign monitoring or vital sign assessment) 131 129 13 116
CINAHL complete (wearable devices or wearable technology) AND (vital signs or vital sign monitoring or vital sign assessment) 33 33 6 27
Medline (proquest) (wearable devices or wearable technology) AND (vital signs or vital sign monitoring or vital sign assessment) 188 184 20 159
Total reviewed: 24 302

Results

Four themes were identified from the literature: device clinically validated (33%),device not clinically validated (29%), devices ability to enable an early response to the deteriorating patient (24%) and devices ability to help reduce the length of hospital stay (5%).

Conclusions

From examining the literature the technology is still newly emerging and whilst increasingly more devices have been FDA approved and CE marked they haven't necessarily been clinically validated. It is evident that at this stage there is not a device that can replace all intermittent observations for all patients within the inpatient setting.There are some clear gaps in the literature around the acceptability to patients and the potential mental health effects of reducing the regular contact point with nursing staff. Within Haematology and Oncology the future use of wearable devices in the ambulatory care setting is likely to be introduced.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The author.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research - Clinical Internship Programme.

Disclosure

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.