Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1053P - Tumour mutational burden (TMB) assessment using next generation sequencing (NGS) for the prediction of complete response (CR) to immunotherapy (IO) in metastatic melanoma

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Immunology;  Targeted Therapy;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Melanoma

Presenters

Timothy Humphries

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S867-S905. 10.1016/annonc/annonc706

Authors

T.G. Humphries1, T. Giardina2, N. Mesbah Ardakani2, M.A. Khattak3, T. Meniawy1, A. Jacques4, E.S. Gray5, B. Amanuel2, M. Millward6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, 6009 - Nedlands/AU
  • 2 Anatomical Pathology, PathWest, 6009 - NEDLANDS/AU
  • 3 Oncology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, 6150 - Perth/AU
  • 4 Department Of Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, 6009 - NEDLANDS/AU
  • 5 School Of Medical And Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, 6027 - Perth/AU
  • 6 School Of Medicine, University of Western Australia, 6009 - Perth/AU

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1053P

Background

TMB is an emerging biomarker of IO response, however in the setting of a wide variation in median TMB values between cancer subtypes, histology specific thresholds predicting response remain unclear. The TruSight Oncology 500® (TSO 500) is a comprehensive 523 gene NGS assay and is highly concordant with whole exome sequencing in TMB assessment. Thresholds predicting meaningful response to IO such as CR in metastatic melanoma using this panel are needed.

Methods

Consenting cutaneous melanoma patients treated with IO with radiographic or metabolic CR of at least 6 months duration, and patients with early progression (EP) (confirmed disease progression within 6 months, including stage III patients on adjuvant IO) had IO-naïve tissue sequenced with the TSO 500. TMB values in mutations per megabase (mut/Mb) were calculated and compared with the Mann–Whitney U test. TMB thresholds predicting CR vs EP were assessed using area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) regression analysis, after adjustment for covariates including age, stage, BRAF status & IO type.

Results

18 EP samples and 34 CR tumours have been sequenced with adequate quality control. 31/34 CRs are ongoing. 50% of EP and 56% of CR patients had received anti-PD1 monotherapy with remainder having received combination therapy. TMB correlated strongly with CR (p<0.001) with a median TMB of 13.3 (EP) vs 53.2 (CR). The AUC for TMB by responder group (95%CI) was 0.843 (0.724-0.962) (p<0.001). Thresholds predicting CR vs EP are shown in the table. TMB as a continuous variable correlated strongly with CR (OR of 1.03 for every 1 mut/Mb TMB increase), both in univariate and multivariate modelling (p=0.014). Table: 1053P

TMB thresholds predicting CR after IO based on AUC regression

TMB threshold Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) OR (95% CI)
TMB>10* 100 44.4 Not calculable
TMB>16 91.2 61.1 16.24 (3.56-74.05) P<0.001
TMB>23** 76.5 77.8 11.38 (2.91-44.53) p<0.001

*Maximum sensitivity cutoff, **Optimal sensitivity & specificity cutoff using Youden Index

Conclusions

Overall, TMB measured using the TSO 500 is a strong predictor of CR. Ongoing validation in a cohort of 40 patients will be presented.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Western Australian Health Translation Network, WA Cancer and Palliative Care Network.

Disclosure

T. Meniawy: Financial Interests, Personal, Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb. M. Millward: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.