Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1478P - Trends in treatment patterns among Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) patients receiving treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Presenters

Gabriela Dieguez

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S1084-S1095. 10.1016/annonc/annonc709

Authors

G. Dieguez1, S. Tomicki1, D. DeStephano1, P. Cockrum2, G. Kim3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Health, Milliman, 11102 - New York/US
  • 2 , Oncology. Ipsen Medical – Heor, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge/US
  • 3 Hematology And Oncology, George Washington University, Washington D.C./US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1478P

Background

There is limited research evaluating trends in the use of regimen sequences among patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (m-PANC).

Methods

We identified pts with m-PANC using ICD-10 diagnosis codes in the 2016-2019 Medicare Parts A/B/D 100% Research Identifiable Files. Study pts had 2+ claims with a pancreatic cancer diagnosis and Medicare FFS coverage for 6 months pre- and 3 months post-metastasis diagnosis. A line of therapy (LOT) was assigned based on the order and number of therapies used in each sequence (first, second, or third-line). Regimen sequences had no subsequent chemotherapy following the last regimen within a sequence. We examined one-line, two-line, and three-line sequences.

Results

We identified 31,782 total pts with 21,304 one-line sequences, 7,352 two-line sequences, and 3,126 three-line sequences between 2016 and 2019. Of these, 69% received chemotherapy in 2019, compared to 56% in 2016. In 2019, fewer pts used one-line sequences (41%) and more pts used two- or three-line sequences (28%), compared to 47% and 9%, respectively, in 2016. Among pts receiving two-line sequences, sequences consisting of FOLFIRINOX (FFX) to gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (gem/nab) or gem/nab to liposomal irinotecan had the largest increase (from 10% and 5%, respectively, in 2016 to 14% and 11% in 2019). Among pts receiving three-line sequences, the sequences with the largest increase in utilization were FFX to gem/nab to liposomal irinotecan or gem/nab to liposomal irinotecan to FOLFOX (1% and 0% respectively, of all pts with three-line sequences in 2016, compared to 4% and 5% in 2019).

Conclusions

The use of two- and three- line sequences increased consistently from 2016 to 2019. Sequences containing liposomal irinotecan in second and third line are the primary drivers of this increase.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc.

Disclosure

G. Dieguez: Financial Interests, Institutional, Sponsor/Funding: Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc. S. Tomicki: Financial Interests, Institutional, Sponsor/Funding: Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc. D. DeStephano: Financial Interests, Institutional, Sponsor/Funding: Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc. P. Cockrum: Financial Interests, Institutional, Leadership Role: Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc. G. Kim: Financial Interests, Institutional, Sponsor/Funding: Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.