Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

707P - Treatment pattern and overall survival among patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: Results from a complete nationwide unselected real-world registry study in Denmark from 2010 to 2017

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy

Tumour Site

Urothelial Cancer

Presenters

Jorgen Bjerggaard Jensen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S678-S724. 10.1016/annonc/annonc675

Authors

J. Bjerggaard Jensen1, D.S. Hauberg2, M. Duus Hjortsoe3, M.E. Madsen4, J. Olsen4, M. Agerbæk5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 - Aarhus/DK
  • 2 Health And Value, Pfizer Denmark, Pfizer, 2750 - Copenhagen/DK
  • 3 Medical Affairs, Pfizer, 2750 - Copenhagen/DK
  • 4 Incentive, Incentive, 2840 - Holte/DK
  • 5 Department Of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 - Aarhus/DK

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 707P

Background

Platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) remains the cornerstone of first-line (1L) treatment of locally advanced (LA) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, the optimal number of PBC cycles remains unknown. We provide a report on treatment patterns and effectiveness in the pre–immuno-oncology (IO) era.

Methods

Among all Danish UC patients with an incidence date between 2010 and 2017, we identified a population with stage IIIb or IV (n=3206) (AJCC, 8th edition) UC, 36% (n=1141) of whom received systemic anticancer therapy for their disease. Patients were stratified by the number of completed 1L cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine (CG) or carboplatin-gemcitabine (CaG). We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate overall survival (OS), number of patients who lived long term (OS>2 years) on 1L therapy only and share of patients who received second-line (2L) treatment.

Results

811 patients (71 % of patients receiving systemic therapy) received CG or CaG during the study period. 71% were men, and mean age was 67.9 years (SD, 9.1 years). Patients on CG were younger (64.4 vs 70.8 years) and had a longer median OS (mOS; 14.2 vs 8.6 months) than CaG recipients (mean follow-up, 28 and 21.3 months, respectively). Only 14% and 7% of patients on CG and CaG lived long term. 35% of all LA/mUC patients receiving 1L CG or CaG treatment reached 2L treatment within ≥1 year of follow-up.

Conclusions

In an unselected nationwide Danish registry cohort, 36% of patients received systemic anticancer therapy. Also, only 35% of PBC treated patients got 2L treatment, with few patients living long term on 1L CG or CaG only. The attrition highlights the need to treat patients with LA/mUC with the most effective and tolerable frontline agents; these may alleviate the unmet need in this elderly population with poor outcomes. Table: 707P

Effectiveness of treatment in patients who received CG or CaG as 1L treatment

1L treatment No. of chemo cycles N OS, median, months 6, 12- and 24-months OS rates, % OS >2 years on 1L only, n Patients receiving 2L, n (%)
CG 1-3 104 5.8 47, 35, 21 13 26 (25)
4 60 14.5 80, 58, 37 11 23 (38)
5 50 14.4 >95, 60, 36 9 16 (32)
6 139 17.0 92, 63, 35 22 63 (45)
>6 189 16.7 96, 66, 39 23 84 (44)
All 542 14.2 83, 58, 34 78 (14.4%) 212 (39)
CaG 1-3 99 4.5 42, 19, 9 6 17 (17)
4 35 7.9 74, 29, 11 <5 9 (26)
5 35 10.6 80, 46, 29 <5 8 (23)
6 76 12.8 >95, 53, 24 5 31 (41)
>6 31 11.0 >95, 45, 23 <5 11 (35)
All 276 8.8 71, 36, 17 20 (7.2%) 76 (28)

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Pfizer and Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Funding

Pfizer and Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Disclosure

J. Bjerggaard Jensen: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Medac; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Photocure; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: ASA; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Ferring; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Cephaid; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Personal Fees: Photocure; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Personal Fees: ASA; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Personal Fees: Olympus; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Personal Fees: Ferring; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Personal Fees: Cephaid; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Personal Fees: Medac; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Personal Fees: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Personal Fees: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Personal Fees: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Personal Fees: Ambu; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Personal Fees: Intuitive Surgery; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Personal Fees: Roche. M. Duus Hjortsoe: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Pfizer. M.E. Madsen: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Incentive. J. Olsen: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Incentive. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.