Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

447P - The prognostic factors in early stage BRAF mutant colorectal cancer: Experience from a large volume UK tertiary centre

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Justin Mencel

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S530-S582. 10.1016/annonc/annonc698

Authors

J. Mencel, H. Lamont, S. Rao, D. Watkins, C. Fribbens, D. Cunningham, I. Chau, N. Starling

Author affiliations

  • Gi And Lymphoma Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, SW3 6JJ - London and Sutton/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 447P

Background

BRAF mutations (BRAFm) in colorectal cancer (CRC) are seen in 8% of late stage and 15% of early stage disease. In metastatic CRC, BRAFm is prognostic for poor overall survival. The clinical significance of BRAFm in early stage disease has been described as a poor prognostic factor, however there is heterogeneity seen within this population. We aim to assess prognostic variables in a cohort of BRAFm CRC.

Methods

We retrospectively collected clinical characteristic and outcome data from patients diagnosed with BRAFm early stage CRC at the Royal Marsden Hospital from March 2014 to December 2020. Next generation sequencing of the BRAF gene was performed as part of routine care. Variables including gender, age at diagnosis, stage of disease, side of primary, MMR status and type of BRAF mutation were assessed and survival estimates calculated. Analyses were performed using Cox regression.

Results

There were 166 patients with BRAFm early stage CRC, including 75 (45.2%) males. Median age at diagnosis was 69 years. 4 (2.4%) patients had stage 1 disease, 53 (31.9%) stage 2 disease, 105 (63.3%) stage 3 disease, and 4 without staging (2.4%). 123 (74%) primary tumours were right sided, 42 (25%) left sided and 1 unknown. 85 (51.2%) of tumours were dMMR, 73 (44%) pMMR tumours, 8 (4.8%) were unknown. 158 had V600E mutations, 8 were non-V600E. 111 patients were relapse free at 4 years. There was a significant difference in 4 year relapse free survival (RFS) between pMMR tumours (37%) compared with dMMR tumours (84%) (HR 4.43, p<0.01). Those with node positive disease had an almost 3 times higher risk of relapse compared to node negative disease (p=0.003). Left sided tumours were also more likely to relapse compared to right sided (HR 1.94, p=0.02). There was no significant difference between V600E and non-V600E tumours on RFS. In a multi-variate analysis, nodal stage (HR 3.37, p=0.01) and pMMR status was associated with the highest risk of relapse (HR 4.68, p<0.001).

Conclusions

In early stage BRAFm CRC, MMR status and nodal stage of disease was predictive of relapse in our real world cohort.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust.

Funding

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust.

Disclosure

S. Rao: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bayer; Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel and accommodation: Incyte; Bayer. D. Cunningham: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca; Clovis; Eli Lilly; 4SC; Bayer; Celgene; NIHR EME; Leap; Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: OVIBIO. I. Chau: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Astella; Astra-Zeneca; Bayer; Boehinger Ingelheim; BMS; Eisai; Eli Lilly; Incyte; Merck; MSD; OncXerna; Pierre Fabre; Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eli Lilly; Other, Personal, Other, DMC Chairman: Five Prime Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Principal Investigator: Cilag-Janssen; Eli Lilly. N. Starling: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant, + Travel grant: AstraZeneca; BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Pfizer; NIHR EME; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Travel grant + Honoraria: Eli Lilly; Merck; MSD Oncology; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Travel grant: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Pierre Fabre; Servier; GSK; Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer; AstraZeneca; Servier; Merck. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.