Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

705P - Systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) of first-line (1L) therapies for locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC)

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Urothelial Cancer

Presenters

Lisa Bloudek

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S678-S724. 10.1016/annonc/annonc675

Authors

L. Bloudek1, Z. Hepp2, C. McKay3, B. Devine4, C. Derleth5, J. Lill5, E. Lenero6, P. Wright2, S.D. Ramsey7, S.D. Sullivan8

Author affiliations

  • 1 Choice Institute, University of Washington/Curta Inc., 98104 - Seattle/US
  • 2 Global Health Economics And Outcomes Research, Seagen Inc., 98021 - Bothell/US
  • 3 Global Heor, Oncology/global Medical Affairs, Astellas Pharma Global Development Inc., 60062 - Northbrook/US
  • 4 Choice Institute, University of Washington, 98195 - Seattle/US
  • 5 Medical Affairs, Seagen Inc., 98021 - Bothell/US
  • 6 Medical Affairs, Astellas Pharma Global Development Inc., 60062 - Northbrook/US
  • 7 Hutchinson Institute For Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/CHOICE Institute, University of Washington, 98109-1024 - Seattle/US
  • 8 Hutchinson Institute For Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/CHOICE Institute, University of Washington, 98195 - Seattle/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 705P

Background

Gemcitabine+cisplatin (GC) or carboplatin (GCa) are the global 1L standard of care (SOC) therapies for la/mUC; however, prognosis is poor and <50% of patients receive 1L chemotherapy. Several alternative 1L regimens are recognized by guidelines/used in practice, and new therapies are emerging. This SLR and NMA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared outcomes of alternative 1L regimens with SOC to better understand the unmet need.

Methods

An SLR of phase II/III RCTs was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and NICE guidelines to identify 1L la/mUC therapies (01/2000-05/2020). Two networks were created: cisplatin (cis)-eligible/mixed eligibility and cis-ineligible. Comparative efficacy and safety were assessed via NMA under a Bayesian framework. Survival outcomes with 1L regimens vs SOC (GC/GCa) are reported.

Results

Among 1765 publications identified in the SLR, 96 representing 39 unique RCTs were selected for data extraction. Of these, 11 were included in the cis-eligible/mixed network and 6 in the cis-ineligible network. The NMA excluded therapies that were not effective or adopted in clinical practice; 3 maintenance trials were identified but excluded due to differences in study design precluding comparisons. Based on a fixed effects meta-analysis of SOC arms in each network, median overall survival (OS) was 13.2 mo (95% CI 12.4-14.0) for the cis-eligible/mixed and 9.7 mo (95% CI 6.7-12.8) for the cis-ineligible network; progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 (95% CI 6.3-7.4) and 5.6 mo (95% CI 4.9-6.3), respectively. OS and PFS were similar to SOC across all interventions included in the NMA (all credible intervals [CrI] crossed or were close to 1; Table). Table: 705P

HR for OS and PFS compared with SOC (GC/GCa for cis-eligible, GCa for cis-ineligible)

Comparator OS PFS
Cis-eligible, HR (95% CrI)
ddMVAC 0.7 (0.5, 1.0) 0.7 (0.5, 0.9)
ddGC 0.7 (0.4, 1.1) 0.5 (0.3, 0.9)
Atezo+GC/GCa 0.8 (0.7, 1.0) 0.8 (0.7, 1.0)
Durva+tremelimumab 0.9 (0.7, 1.0)
Paclitaxel+GC/GCa 0.9 (0.7, 1.0) 0.9 (0.7, 1.0)
Pembro+GC/GCa 0.9 (0.7, 1.0) 0.8 (0.7, 0.9)
MVAC 0.9 (0.8, 1.1) 0.9 (0.8, 1.1)
Pembro 0.9 (0.8, 1.1)
Durva 1.0 (0.8, 1.2)
Atezo 1.0 (0.8, 1.2)
Docataxel+cis 1.4 (1.0, 2.0) 1.6 (1.1, 2.3)
Cis-ineligible, HR (95% CrI)
Durva+tremelimumab 0.9 (0.7, 1.1)
Viniflunine+gem 1.1 (0.6, 1.9) 0.8 (0.4, 1.3)
Oxaliplatin+gem 1.4 (0.8, 2.3) 1.1 (0.7, 1.8)
M-CAVI 1.0 (0.7, 1.3)

Conclusions

Survival outcomes are similar and remain poor among existing 1L therapies for la/mUC, highlighting the continued unmet need in this largely incurable population. The impact of maintenance could not be evaluated within the framework of this 1L NMA.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Editorial support was provided by Jonathon Carthy of Curo, a division of Envision Pharma Group, and funded by Seagen Inc. and Astellas Pharma Inc.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Seagen Inc. and Astellas Pharma Inc.

Funding

Seagen Inc. and Astellas Pharma Inc.

Disclosure

L. Bloudek: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Received support from Seagen for this research.: Seagen. Z. Hepp: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Seagen Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Seagen Inc. C. McKay: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Astellas Pharma Inc. B. Devine: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Received support from Seagen Inc. for this research: Seagen Inc. C. Derleth: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Seagen Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Seagen Inc. J. Lill: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Seagen Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Seagen Inc. E. Lenero: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Astellas Pharma Inc. P. Wright: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Seagen Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Seagen Inc. S.D. Ramsey: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Received support from Seagen Inc. for this research: Seagen Inc. S.D. Sullivan: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Received support from Seagen Inc. for this research: Seagen Inc.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.