Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1406P - Survival outcomes in older adults with metastatic gastric and esophageal carcinoma receiving palliative chemotherapy

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Cancer in Older Adults

Tumour Site

Oesophageal Cancer;  Gastric Cancer

Presenters

Michael Allen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S1040-S1075. 10.1016/annonc/annonc708

Authors

M.J. Allen1, O. Espin-Garcia2, C. Suzuki3, E. Panov1, L. Ma3, B. Yvonne1, R. Jang1, E. Chen1, G. Darling4, J. Yeung4, C. Swallow5, S. Brar5, S. Kalimuthu6, R. Wong7, P. Veit-Haibach8, E. Elimova1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, M5G 2M9 - Toronto/CA
  • 2 Department Of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto/CA
  • 3 Department Of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto/CA
  • 4 Division Of Thoracic Oncology, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, M5G 2C4 - Toronto/CA
  • 5 Department Of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, M5G 1X5 - Toronto/CA
  • 6 Division Of Pathology, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, M5G 2C4 - Toronto/CA
  • 7 Department Of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, M5G 2M9 - Toronto/CA
  • 8 Joint Department Of Medical Imaging, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, M5G 2C4 - Toronto/CA

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1406P

Background

60% of patients with gastric and esophageal carcinoma (GEC) are aged ≥65y, with 26% >75y, yet the elderly are historically underrepresented in clinical trials. The impact of palliative chemotherapy (CTx) on survival is thus relatively poorly understood in the elderly. We sought to determine survival outcomes for patients with metastatic GEC relative to age.

Methods

A retrospective database analysis (2007-2019) was performed with patients separated by age: 65-74y (old), and ≥75y (old-old) with survival for those receiving CTx analysed. Multivariate (MVA) Cox proportional hazard regression modelling was performed with adjustment for age, gender, Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI), ethnicity, histology, location of tumour and ECOG performance status (PS).

Results

307 patients were included: 198 ‘old’ and 109 ‘old-old’. The median age was 70 v 79.5y (p<0.001). There were no significant differences relative to gender, ethnicity, BMI and PS. Median CCI for ‘old’ was 0 (0,11) and 1 (0,8) for ‘old-old’ (p<0.001). Adenocarcinoma was the most common histology in both groups. The primary tumour location was predominately esophageal/AEG1-2 in ‘old’ (62%) and gastric/AGE3 in ‘old-old’ patients (52%) (p=0.022). 119 (60%) ‘old’ and 25 (23%) ‘old-old’ patients received CTx (p<0.001). Poor PS was the most common cited rationale for non-receipt of CTx in both ‘old’ (46%) and ‘old-old’ patients (36%). Age was the second most common reason in ‘old-old’ patients (25%) but not considered prohibitive in the ‘old’ cohort (p<0.001). Disease progression lead to CTx discontinuation in 67% (old) and 70% (old-old) patients, whilst toxicity was the reason in 15% and 13% respectively (p=0.97). Median PFS was 6.4 (95% CI 5.9-7.6) v 7.5 (95% CI 5.1-11.3) months in ‘old’ and old-old’ respectively (p=0.69), whilst median OS was 12.3 (95% CI 10.1-15.5) v 10.4 (95% CI 9-14.6) months respectively (p=0.0816). MVA indicated that age did not influence PFS (p=0.94) or OS (p=0.057).

Conclusions

Whilst treatment with CTx was more common in younger patients, our analysis indicated survival outcomes were comparable with toxicity leading to treatment discontinuation rates similar. This suggests age itself should not predetermine treatment with palliative CTx.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

E. Elimova: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Zymeworks; Financial Interests, Institutional, Licensing Fees, Consultancy Fees: Adaptimmune; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Zymeworks; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Spouse employee: Merck Vaccines. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.