Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

317P - Survival analysis and prognostic factors in patients with metastatic breast cancer and oligometastatic disease

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Gema Marin Zafra

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S457-S515. 10.1016/annonc/annonc689

Authors

G. Marin Zafra1, E.G. Torralba2, V. Garcia3, P. de la Morena2, M..J. Martinez Ortiz4, E. Garcia1, A. Ivars1, B. Alvarez Abril1, M. Sánchez Cánovas1, E. Garcia Martinez1, F. Ayala de la Peña1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, 30008 - Murcia/ES
  • 2 Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, 3008 - Murcia/ES
  • 3 Oncology Radiotherapy Department, Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucia, 30202 - Cartagena/ES
  • 4 Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucia, 30202 - Cartagena/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 317P

Background

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) includes tumors of different clinical and biological behavior. Oligometastatic breast cancer (OM) is defined as low volume disease, limited to a maximum of ≤5 lesions, not necessarily in the same organ and potentially susceptible to local treatment. The actual incidence, characteristics, prognosis, and treatment options in OM is a reason for study at the present time.

Methods

Observational, retrospective study of patients with MBC and OM treated in Oncology Department of Morales Meseguer Hospital (Murcia) for the years 2009 to 2020. Overall survival analysis using metods Kaplan Meier and univariate and multivariate Cox models.

Results

In a cohort of 395 patients with MBC, 88 (18.4%) had OM with a median age of 56 years. The clinical-pathological characteristics of OM are detailed in the table. The median overall survival (OS) of OM was 56.7 months (95% CI 42-71) vs 34.9 months (95% CI 28-41) in polymetastatic (p = 0.01). In the univariate analysis, in OM at debut, OS was 69.4 months(95% CI 46-92) vs 48.9 months (95% CI 31-65 CI) in oligorrecurrence (p = 0.05); 1-3 locations,OS was 65.6 months (95% CI 49-81) vs 28.4 months (95% CI 18-38) in 4-5 locations (p = 0.02); in ECOG 0, OS was 74.4 months (95% CI 66-82) vs 48.9 months (95% CI 22-75) in ECOG1 (p = 0.01); the presence of pain was associated with an OS of 41.4 months (95% CI 22-60) vs 83.3 months (95% CI 33-132) in asymptomatic patients (p = 0.01). In the Her2+ phenotype OS was lower than in luminal disease: 54 months (95% CI 23-107) in Her 2+ vs 63 months (95% CI 42-84) in luminal disease (p=0.574). In the multivariate analysis for OS, the ECOG (HR 2.29: 95% CI 1.33-3.95, p= 0.003), number of injuries (HR 2.78: 95% CI 1.19-6.47, p=0.02) and the presence of pain (HR 2.2 95% CI 1.05-4.9, p = 0.03) remained as independent variables. Table: 317P

Clinical and pathological characteristics N %
Age (median)56 years (54)
Hormone-sensitive 59 68.6
Her 2-positive 11 12.8
Triple-negative 16 18.6
Grade 1 5 5.7
Grade 2 43 49.4
Grade 3 35 40.2
Metastasis location (Bone) 30 34.5
Metastasis location (Visceral) 21 24.1
Metastasis location (SNC) 8 9.2
Number of locations (1-3) 70 80.5
Number of locations (4-5) 17 19.5
Oligorecurrence 63 71.6
Oligometastatic 25 28.4
ECOG 0 44 57.9
ECOG 1 28 36.8
ECOG 2 4 5.3
Treatment of the primary tumor (yes) 83 95.4
Treatment of the primary tumor (no) 4 4.6
Type of local treatment (Stereotactic body radiation therapy) 9 18.4
Type of local treatment (Radiotherapy) 15 30.6
Type of local treatment (Surgery) 25 51

Conclusions

OM is a subgroup of patients with prolonged survival. The OM at diagnosis, pain and ECOG have been identified in our series as independent prognostic factors of OS.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.