Abstract 764P
Background
Since the introduction of Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) the Breast Cancer gene (BRCA)-testing has evolved as a standard management in high grade ovarian cancer (EOC). The purpose of the study is to analyze the current implementation of BRCA testing and PARPi therapy for EOC in Germany.
Methods
The questionnaire contained 40 questions covering real life data of genetic testing and the use of PARPi. It wasdivided into three main parts: 1. basic demographics of the respondents, 2. indication, counseling and selection of genetic testing, 3. approach of PARPi treatment. The questionnaire was distributed via mail from 14th August 2020 until 3rd May 2021. Statistics were descriptive.
Results
316 physicians participated in the survey. 54.9% were specialized in the field of gynecologic oncology and worked in a certified breast center (65.7%) and/or a gynecological cancer center (68.2%). 67.4% stated to test more than 80,0% of the primary EOC patients for BRCA mutation. The main reasons for failure of BRCA testing were patients` refusal (54.6%) and structural problems (31.7%). Regarding the patients` counseling on genetic testing, 86.3% stated high need for support. 21.5% performed an upfront germline and 5.2% a somatic test only, whereas 24.6% preferred both and 25.1% added a somatic test following a negative germline test. Only 23% of respondents would initiate HRD-testing. The most important criteria for selection of appropriate PARPi therapy were the side- effect profile (78.2%) and efficacy (71.2%). The patients´ request was relevant for only 11.2% of the participants.
Conclusions
Despite the high need for implication of BRCA gene testing and PARPi therapy adequate structure for routine BRCA/HRD testing and systematic education programs are needed. to prevent delay in family counseling and to prevent undertreatment of women with EOC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.