Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1460P - Survey on knowledge and attitudes of emergency medicine physicians towards practice, scope and integration of palliative medicine services in the emergency: Part 3 (indications for a palliative medicine liaison)

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

End-of-Life Care

Tumour Site

Presenters

Rahul D. Arora

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S1076-S1083. 10.1016/annonc/annonc679

Authors

R. D. Arora

Author affiliations

  • Palliative Medicine Department, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, 560029 - Bangalore/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1460P

Background

Evaluation of the readiness of the Emergency medicine physicians in recognizing the palliative needs of a patient presenting to acute care is an important first step in identifying challenges that have prevented closer integration. Acute care represents a unique environment where differences in responses to scenarios presented during a survey and choices made during actual practice (in real-world setting) have the maximum potential to impact patient outcomes.

Methods

This survey was carried out during the first of a series of three-month-long postings in Emergency as part of Senior Resident training. A questionnaire highlighting clinical and administrative issues experienced was distributed among residents and faculty during the academic program.

Results

The following indications were recognized as legitimate indications for a palliative medicine consult by more than half of the respondents - Prognostication regarding goals of care (16/17), multimodality pain management (15/17), refractory dyspnea in metastatic breast cancer (14/17), analgesic titration (11/17), collusion (10/17) and malignant biliary obstruction (9/17). While 8/17 agreed that they would seek a review for chronic constipation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 6/17 would do the same for spasticity-associated pain in multiple sclerosis. Paraneoplastic SIADH/Cerebral salt wasting syndrome and febrile neutropenia in pediatric acute leukemia were considered suitable indications for seeking liaison by 4/17 and 3/17 respondents respectively.

Conclusions

While the agreement with the conventional understanding of the role of a Palliative consult is along expected lines, reasons underlying the lack of willingness to consider a review for non-cancer conditions and pediatric issues need to be explored further. The timing and indication for a Palliative medicine consult at the time of initial triage are issues that have not been discussed in existent guidelines. An early consultation that involves input on medical management needs to be differentiated from early palliative care (assessment of needs at baseline and subsequent follow-up).

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

R.D. Arora.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.