Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1273P - Sputum supernatant as a viable liquid biopsy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Chengzhi Zhou

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S949-S1039. 10.1016/annonc/annonc729

Authors

C. Zhou1, X. Xie1, J. Wu1, B. Guo1, Y. Qin1, X. Lin1, M. Liu1, L. Qiu2, J. Xiang2, Z. Chen3, X. Zou2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Guangzhou Institute Of Respiratory Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 510120 - Guangzhou/CN
  • 2 Department Of Data Science, Burning Rock Biotech, 510300 - Guangzhou/CN
  • 3 Department Of Medical Affairs, Burning Rock Biotech, 510300 - Guangzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1273P

Background

Sputum has attracted attention as a potential medium for detecting genomic abnormalities in early-stage lung cancer. Recent progress in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) has highlighted plasma as a promising alternative. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of mutation profiling with sputum from aNSCLC patients.

Methods

Matched tissue (TIS), plasma (PLA) and sputum supernatant (SPU) were collected from 71 treatment-naïve aNSCLC patients. Capture-based targeted sequencing of all three biopsies was performed with a panel of 520 cancer-related genes. Detection rate was defined as the proportion of patients with any identified genomic aberration.

Results

The cohort had a median age of 59 (range 20-79) with mostly men (54/71). Fifty-six patients had adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and 15 had squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). Detection rates between SPU and PLA were comparably (67.6% vs 70.4%, p = 0.86) but were both significantly lower than that of TIS (96.8%, p < 0.001). For SPU, detection rates were significantly higher in LUSC than in LUAD (93.3% vs 60.7%, p = 0.03) and in centrally than in peripherally located tumors (79.5% vs 53.6%, p = 0.047). Detection rates using SPU was higher than using PLA in centrally located tumors (79.5% vs 61.5%, p = 0.14) but lower in peripherally located tumors (53.6% vs 85.7%, p = 0.02). Next, with TIS as gold standard, we compared the sensitivity of detecting established NSCLC driver alterations. SPU and PLA achieved respective sensitivity of 48% and 63% overall, and 59% for both in centrally located tumors. Importantly, SPU enabled more sensitive detection than PLA in the entire cohort and in centrally located tumors for altered KRAS and ALK but less sensitive for EGFR mutations in both populations. Detection of aberrant MET, however, appeared difficult for both biopsies (0/3 for both). In addition, tumor mutation burden estimates from SPU and PLA were highly correlated (Pearson r = 0.78).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that for aNSCLC patients, sputum supernatant showed comparable performance as plasma in genomic profiling. Sputum is a viable alternative liquid biopsy, especially for analyzing most actionable driver mutations in patients with centrally located tumors or LUSC.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

L. Qiu: Financial Interests, Personal, Member, The author was an employee of Burning Rock Biotech during the conduct of the study: Burning Rock Biotech. J. Xiang: Financial Interests, Personal, Member, The author was an employee of Burning Rock Biotech during the conduct of the study: Burning Rock Biotech. Z. Chen: Financial Interests, Personal, Member, The author was an employee of Burning Rock Biotech during the conduct of the study: Burning Rock Biotech. X. Zou: Financial Interests, Personal, Member, The author was an employee of Burning Rock Biotech during the conduct of the study: Burning Rock Biotech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.