Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

56P - Serum protein signatures as potential novel diagnostic biomarkers for biliary tract cancer

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Hepatobiliary Cancers

Presenters

Troels Christensen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S376-S381. 10.1016/annonc/annonc685

Authors

T.D. Christensen1, E. Maag2, O. Larsen1, C.L. Feltoft3, B. Leerhøy4, I.M. Chen1, C.P. Hansen5, D.L. Nielsen1, J.S. Johansen1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2730 - Herlev/DK
  • 2 Bioxpedia, BioXpedia A/S, 8200 - Aarhus/DK
  • 3 Department Of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2730 - Herlev/DK
  • 4 Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2400 - Copenhagen/DK
  • 5 Department Of Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 - Copenhagen/DK

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 56P

Background

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) has a very poor prognosis. The only potentially curative treatment is surgery, but most patients are ineligible for this treatment due to advanced disease. Thus, biomarkers that can identify BTC at an early stage are needed. We aimed to identify protein signatures that could discriminate patients with BTC from non-cancer participants.

Methods

The study included 191 patients with all stages of BTC (gall bladder cancer (n=37), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CC) (n=92), and extrahepatic CC (n=62), and 250 controls (healthy (n=90), benign biliary tract disease (n=25), and other benign diseases (n=135)). We analyzed serum levels of immuno-oncology (I-O) related proteins using the Olink I-O assay (Olink Proteomics, Sweden) as well as CA19-9. To identify protein signatures and test their performance, the cohort was split randomly in a training (2/3) and replication set (1/3). Signatures were identified in the training set using logistic elastic-net (Lasso and Ridge) regressions. We generated signatures with decreasing number of proteins based on the proteins’ stability as predictors in Lasso regression. Signature performance was evaluated in both datasets using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using best point.

Results

Sixteen unique protein signatures including 2 to 84 proteins were generated. All signatures included CA19-9 and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20 (CCL20). Overall, all signatures showed promising performance in both the training and replication set with AUC ranging from 0.95 – 0.99 for BTC vs. all controls. The lowest AUC was observed for signatures with less than 6 proteins. The best point sensitivity ranged from 91% -100% and specificity from 85% - 96% in the replication set. The best performing signatures achieved an AUC of 0.99 with a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 96%. All signatures identified patients with BTC independent of primary tumor location and stage (AUC ≥ 0.95).

Conclusions

We identified several protein signatures that could discriminate BTC patients from non-cancer participants with high sensitivity and specificity. A validation study in an independent cohort is ongoing.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

The Danish Cancer Society, Beckett Fonden, Fonden til fremme af klinisk cancerforskning, Tømremester Holms Mindelegat, Fonden til Lægevidenskabens Fremme.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.