Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1286P - Senescent immune phenotype (SIP) status predicts resistance to immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) among CMV+ advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Immunology;  Cytotoxic Therapy;  Immunotherapy;  Cancer Biology;  Translational Research

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Marie Naigeon

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S949-S1039. 10.1016/annonc/annonc729

Authors

M. Naigeon1, C. de Oliveira1, F. Danlos2, B. Duchemann1, L. Boselli1, S. Farhane3, S. Messayke4, L. Bedouda5, C. Mohamed-Djalim2, F. Griscelli6, A. Marabelle2, L. Cassard1, B. Besse7, N. Chaput1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Laboratory Of Immunomonitoring In Oncology, Cnrs-ums 3655 And Inserm-us23, Paris Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif, Cedex/FR
  • 2 Drug Development Department, Inserm U1015-lrti, Paris Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif/FR
  • 3 Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif/FR
  • 4 Pharmacovigilance Functional Unit (ufpv), Gustave Roussy, 94800 - Villejuif/FR
  • 5 Clinical Research Operations Department (sorc), Gustave Roussy, 94800 - Villejuif/FR
  • 6 Department Of Biopathology, Gustave Roussy, 94800 - Villejuif/FR
  • 7 Dept Of Cancer Medicine, Paris Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1286P

Background

Immunosenescence is a progressive remodeling of immune functions with a multifactorial etiology (aging, chronic inflammation, persistent infections, cancer). CMV has been shown to act as chronic antigenic stressor and to accelerate immune ageing by affecting peripheral blood T cell phenotypes, including loss of CD28 or overexpression of CD57. We defined a SIP as the proportion of CD28CD57+KLRG1+CD8+ circulating T cells. We showed that a high pretreatment SIP (>39.5%, SIP+) was associated with resistance to ICB in patients with aNSCLC. We aimed to assess the role of SIP combined to CMV status on ICB outcomes in aNSCLC patients.

Methods

Baseline SIP status was assessed by flow cytometry on fresh blood samples from ICB-treated aNSCLC patients. CMV serology was determined by enzyme immunoassay. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the logrank test.

Results

95 aNSCLC patients treated with ICB [43% 1st line; 57% ≥ 2 lines] were evaluable for SIP: 75% had a disease progression, 21% were SIP+, SIP median value was 21.9% (min 0%, max 68.9%), and median age was 64.1 years. Median PFS and OS were 3.8 and 13 months respectively. Among 92 patients evaluable for CMV status, 58% were CMV-positive (CMV+). As expected, median PFS was significantly lower in SIP+ (2.45 vs 4 months, p=0.0271) and median OS was lower in SIP+ (7.4 vs non reached, p=0.0618) compared to SIP- patients. CMV+ patient’s rate was significantly higher in SIP+ compared to SIP- patients (94.4% vs 48.6%, p=0.0003). CMV status was not sufficient to predict outcomes (Median PFS CMV+ patients 3 vs 5.2 months in CMV-, p=0.1606). Among CMV+, SIP+ patients represent only 32.1%; these SIP+ patients had lower PFS (1.9 vs 3.3 months, p=0.0401) and OS (6.2 months vs non reached, p=0.0736) than SIP-.

Conclusions

CMV+ status is associated with SIP phenotype, SIP+ identifies patients with poorer outcomes in CMV+ aNSCLC.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03984318.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris.

Funding

Malakoff Médéric.

Disclosure

B. Duchemann: Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Other: Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Other: Oxyvie; Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Other: Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Other: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other: MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other: BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other: Chiesi. N. Chaput: Financial Interests, Institutional, Sponsor/Funding: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Sponsor/Funding: BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Sponsor/Funding: GSK; Financial Interests, Institutional, Sponsor/Funding: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Sponsor/Funding: Sanofi; Financial Interests, Institutional, Sponsor/Funding: Cytune Pharma. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.