Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

453P - Routine DPYD mutation testing for patients receiving fluoropyrimidines for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers: Real world experience in a tertiary UK oncology centre

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer;  Anal Cancer;  Hepatobiliary Cancers;  Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

David Lau

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S530-S582. 10.1016/annonc/annonc698

Authors

D.K.W. Lau1, C. Fong1, F. Arouri1, L. Cortez2, H. Katifi1, R. Gonzalez-Exposito1, M.B. Razzaq1, S. Li1, A. Macklin-Doherty1, C. Fribbens1, D. Watkins1, S. Rao1, I. Chau1, D. Cunningham1, N. Starling1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Gi And Lymphoma Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, SW3 6JJ - London and Sutton/GB
  • 2 Pharmacy Department, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, SW3 6JJ - London and Sutton/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 453P

Background

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) is an important enzyme in the metabolism of fluoropyrimidines. Genetic variations in the DPYD gene are associated with severe fluoropyrimidine toxicity and up front dose reductions are indicated. The UK National Health Service (NHS) now recommends DPYD genetic testing for all patients considered for fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate routine DPYD mutation testing on fluoropyrimidine associated toxicity in a cohort of GI cancer patients in a high-volume tertiary centre.

Methods

Patients with GI cancers at the Royal Marsden were tested for DPYD mutations (c.1905+1G>A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A, c.1601G>A) prior to commencing fluoropyrimidines alone or in combination with other cytotoxics and/or radiotherapy. Patients with a DPYD heterozygous mutation received an initial dose reduction of 25-50%. DPYD homozygous carriers did not receive fluoropyrimidines. Patients who had previously received fluoropyrimidines were excluded. Toxicity by CTCAE v4.03 criteria was compared between DPYD heterozygous mutation and wild type carriers.

Results

Between 1st December 2018 and 31st July 2019, 393 patients commencing a capecitabine (63.6%) or 5-FU (36.4%) containing regimen were included in the study. Of the 371 patients who were tested 33 (8.8%) were heterozygous DPYD variant carriers and 338 (91.2%) were DPYD wild type. The most prevalent mutations were c.1601G>A (n=16) and c.1236G>A (n=9). Mean relative dose intensity for the first dose was 54.2% (range 37.5-75%) for DPYD heterozygous carriers and 93.2% (42.9-100%) for DPYD wild-type carriers. Overall grade ≥3 toxicity was similar in DPYD variant carriers (12.1%) as compared with wild type carriers (25.7%; Exact Fisher P=0.0924).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates successful routine DPYD mutation testing prior to the initiation of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy with high uptake. In this real world setting, the frequency of genotypic variants is in keeping with published data. In patients with DPYD heterozygous mutations, severe toxicity appears to be mitigated by upfront dose reductions of 25-50% as compared to historical controls.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

D.K.W. Lau: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Merck/AGITG. F. Arouri: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Roche; Pierre Fabre. S. Rao: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bayer; Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Incyte; Bayer. I. Chau: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Astellas; AstraZeneca; Bayer; Boehringer Ingelheim; Incyte; Merck-Serono; MSD; Eli Lilly; Pierre Fabre; Roche; Bristol Meyers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eisai; Eli Lilly; OncXerna; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, DMC chairman: Five Prime Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Principal Investigator: Cilag-Janssen; Eli Lilly. D. Cunningham: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: MedImmune/AstraZeneca; Clovis; Eli Lilly; 4SC; Bayer; Celgene; NIHR EME; Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, IMP only: Leap; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Ovibio. N. Starling: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca; Bristol Meyers Squibb; Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Travel/accomodation: AstraZeneca; Bristol Meyers Squibb; Eli Lilly; Merck; Roche; MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer; AstraZeneca; Servier; MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Honoraria: Merck Serono; Pierre Fabre; GSK; Amgen; Eli Lilly; MSD; Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.