Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1868P - Real-world safety of the 6-weekly pembrolizumab regimen in cancer patients treated in South East London

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Presenters

Matthaios Kapiris

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S1237-S1256. 10.1016/annonc/annonc701

Authors

M. Kapiris1, L. Cain1, M. Khan1, C. Aversa1, D. Josephs1, K. Zaki2, M. Harries1, S. Papa3, C. Nikolaou1, D. Enting1, S.M. Rudman1, S. Ghosh1, A. Montes1, L. Karapanagiotou1, J. Spicer4, E. Pintus5, A. Georgiou2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, SE19RT - London/GB
  • 2 Medical Oncology, King's College Hospital, London Guy's Hospital - NHS Foundation Trust, SE1 9RT - London/GB
  • 3 Medical Oncology, King's College London Guy's Hospital - NHS Foundation Trust, SE1 9RT - London/GB
  • 4 Comprehensive Cancer Centre, KCL - King's College London, WC2R 2LS - London/GB
  • 5 Medical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Woolwich, Guy's & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, SE19RT - London/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1868P

Background

Pembrolizumab (pembro) is a PD-1 inhibitor indicated for the treatment (tx) of a several malignancies. Most clinical trials used a 3-weekly tx (Q3W) but a 6-weekly 400mg regimen (Q6W) is now approved, based on pharmacokinetic data, also supported by the KEYNOTE-555 trial. The real world tolerability of the Q6W remains unknown. The COVID-19 pandemic led to rapid adoption of the Q6W tx, usually in patients (pts) previously receiving Q3W tx, as it facilitates less hospital visits. We report the toxicity profile of pts treated with Q6W pembro and the comparison of the preceding Q3W tx.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed adverse events for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), urothelial cancer (UC) and melanoma pts, who received at least 1 cycle of Q6W pembro. Pts that received pembro in combination tx were excluded. Previous Q3W monotherapy was permitted. Toxicity was graded as per CTCAE v5.0.

Results

We included 94 pts (melanoma=39, NSCLC=38, UC=17). Median number of Q6W cycles received was 3 (range 1-6). 71% received the Q3W regimen (median 7 cycles, range 1-32) prior to switching to Q6W. New toxicity of any severity was recorded in 52% (49/94) during Q6W versus 70% (47/67) during Q3W tx. G 3/4 toxicities occurred in 15% (15) during Q6W versus 0% during previous Q3W tx. Of the 27 who started de novo with Q6W, 4 (15%) developed G 3/4 toxicities. G 3/4 toxicities were: GI (4% [colitis = 2, gastritis =1, oral lichen planus = 1]), nephritis (3%), arthralgia (2%), skin (2%), myositis/CK rise (2%), anaemia (1%), myocarditis (1%). Steroids for management of toxicity were initiated in 22% (21) pts, including 8 with G2 toxicity. Three (3%) pts switched back to Q3W administration. None of them received Q6W again. In total 9% of pts in Q6W discontinued tx due to toxicity.

Conclusions

In our cohort of pts, the majority were previously treated with the Q3W regimen without significant toxicity. Switch to Q6W or de novo Q6W pembro led to a 15% rate of G 3/4 toxicity and 9% discontinuation rate. In pts pre-treated with Q3W, we cannot distinguish whether this was due to cumulative toxicity or due to switch to Q6W. More studies are required to ascertain the safety of the Q6W schedule. In the COVID-19 context, any Q6W toxicity concern should be weighed against the advantages of fewer hospital visits.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

1. Lala M, Akala O, Chartash E, et al. Abstract CT042: Pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W dosing: First clinical outcomes data from Keynote-555 cohort B in metastatic melanoma patients. Cancer Res. 2020;80(16 Supplement):CT042 LP-CT042. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2020-CT042

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.