Abstract 1508MO
Background
Molecularly targeted agents (MTA) and immunotherapies (IO) are approved for cancer pt. OLD can be used before the upcoming approval and in different scenarios or conditions from those reflected in regulatory summary approvals. ME programs allow pt to receive OLD. We aimed to improve ME pt selection by developing a prognostic score (ICO MEscore) that included clinic-analytical (CA) variables readily available in real practice.
Methods
Retrospective cohort of metastatic solid tumor pt treated with ME MTA/IO between Jan’11-Dec’19. A multivariate Cox regression model was fitted to predict the risk of death. The Akaike information criterion was considered in a backward selection method. ICO MEscore was derived from a final prognostic model and was categorized using the nomogram and prognostic scores resulting in similar Kaplan-Meier curves.
Results
In total, 441 out of 541 (82%) cases treated with MTA (67%) or IO (33%) had available CA data. Most pt presented ECOG <2 (87%) and had received <3 previous lines (83%). Most frequent subtypes were thoracic (38%) and breast (19%) cancers, and 39% of all tumors harbored actionable oncogenic drivers. Overall, median overall survival (mOS) was 17.7 months (m) (95% CI 14-23). The final multivariate prognostic model included 8 risk factors: ECOG >=1, Body Mass Index <25, non-breast/thoracic tumors, hemoglobin <10.5 g/dL, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio >3, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio <150, >=2 sites of metastases and >=3 previous lines. Four prognostic groups were defined: low risk (LR) mOS 41.5 m (95% CI 35-NR), intermediate-low risk (ILR) mOS 18.1 m (95% CI 13.3-24), intermediate-high risk (IHR) mOS 7 m (95% CI 5.6-9.4) and high risk (HR) mOS 1.5 m (95% CI 1.2-4.2)(log rank test, p<0.001). 1-year OS rates were LR 80%, ILR 60% and IHR 36%, whereas there were no alive pt at 1-year in the HR group.
Conclusions
ICO MEscore is the first prognostic index under development for ME pt selection and our results suggest that could serve to identify HR pt with dismal prognosis. Further validation is warranted to confirm its applicability to rationalize ME decision-making.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1505MO - Improving cancer care through broader access to quality biomarker testing: An IQN Path, ECPC and EFPIA initiative
Presenter: Nicola Normanno
Session: Mini oral session - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1506MO - Incorporating genetic and non-genetic risk factors in breast cancer risk prediction for healthy women with non-informative genetic test result
Presenter: Anja Tüchler
Session: Mini oral session - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1507MO - Selection of quality indicators (QI) by non-hospital professionals for onco-hematology care pathway
Presenter: Mario di Palma
Session: Mini oral session - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1509MO - Adherence to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for the co-development of two or more investigational new drugs in phase 1/2 cancer trials
Presenter: Justin Moyers
Session: Mini oral session - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1510MO_PR - European cancer patients’ perspectives on Immunotherapy
Presenter: Paraskevas Kosmidis
Session: Mini oral session - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Discussion 1505MO, 1506MO and 1507MO
Presenter: Christoph Benedikt Westphalen
Session: Mini oral session - Public policy
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Discussion 1508MO, 1509MO and 1510MO_PR
Presenter: Dario Trapani
Session: Mini oral session - Public policy
Resources:
Slides
Webcast