Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

405P - Prognostic value of neoadjuvant rectal score in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Ana Carlota Caetano

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S530-S582. 10.1016/annonc/annonc698

Authors

A.C. Caetano, J.C. Monteiro, C. Costa, F.R. Salgueiro, M.R. Pires, A.R. Monteiro, J. Paulo, P. Jacinto, N. Bonito, G. Sousa

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology Department, Instituto Portugues Oncologia de Coimbra Francisco Gentil E. P. E. (IPO Coimbra), 3000-075 - Coimbra/PT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 405P

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) is a standard treatment for patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer. Recently, neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score was suggested as an independent prognostic factor after NACRT for rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of NAR score in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who received NACRT followed by surgery.

Methods

We performed a unicentric, retrospective, consecutive case series analysis of the patients with LARC who received NACRT followed by surgical resection between January of 2016 and December of 2019. NAR scores were calculated using the equation [5ypN-3(cT-ypT)+12]2/9.61 and classified as low (<8), intermediate (8-16) and high (>16). Clinicopathological data and survival outcomes were analyzed and correlations between NAR-score and disease-free survival (DFS) were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test.

Results

A total of 110 patients were analyzed, 58.2% male and 41,8% female patients, with a median age of 65 years old (36-83) at the time of diagnosis. The median NAR score was 8.4 (0-65.1). Considering the NAR score classification, 35 (38.5%) had low, 52 (57.2%) had intermediate and 23 (25.3%) had high NAR score. The median observation period was 32.3 months (4.7-62.7). Higher NAR score was associated with higher tumor regression grade (TRG) (p<0.001) and higher ypTNM stage (p<0.001). The 5-year DFS was 81% for low, 71% for intermediate and 41% for high NAR score groups. For high NAR score group the median DFS was 4.17 years (95% C.I 0.53 – 7.82). A statistically significant difference in DFS was observed between the three NAR groups (p=0.002), but there was no significant difference in DFS stratifying according to the TRG classification (p=0.229).

Conclusions

Our results suggested that NAR score could be useful in predicting DFS following NACRT and surgery for LARC. TRG is a histological measure of score tumor response to NACRT and is associated with survival outcomes in literature. However, in our study there was no association between TRG and DFS. Although our data suggest that NAR score might be a predictor of DFS further studies are needed.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.