Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

320P - Prognostic role of meningeal carcinomatosis in breast cancer

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Supportive and Palliative Care

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Renata Meneguetti

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S457-S515. 10.1016/annonc/annonc689

Authors

R.T. Meneguetti1, A. Del Giglio1, F.J.S.M. Cruz2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, 09060-650 - Santo André/BR
  • 2 Oncology, São Camilo Oncologia, 03102-002 - São Paulo/BR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 320P

Background

Breast cancer is common cause of meningeal carcinomatosis (MC). Treatment is chosen by expert opinion due to lack of prospective randomized clinical trials related to therapy. We present here a cohort of patients with MC treated at our institution from 2013 to 2020.

Methods

We evaluated clinical characteristics of consecutive metastatic breast cancer patients including diagnostic methods, treatment and survival.

Results

A total of 109 female patients with mean age of 55.5 years (26-79) were included. Performance status (PS), was analyzed according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), in which 38.5% had ECOG 0-1 and 61.5% ECOG 2-4. Histopathologic characteristics resulted in 80.73% cases of ductal carcinoma; 54.13% histologic grade 2 and 69.72% estrogen receptor+/HER2-. At the time of MC diagnosis 92.66% had evidence of distance disease, 78.90% to bone, 58.72% to visceral and 31.19% brain metastasis. Neoplastic cells in cerebrospinal fluid were present in 60.55% cases. Radiological exams showed leptomeningeal contrast enhancement in 64.22%. Treatment consist on radiotherapy (RT) 36.7%, intrathecal chemotherapy (intra-CT) 44.95%, and 24.77% received systemic treatment (ST), such as chemotherapy or hormone therapy. 13.76% received best supportive care (BSC). Overall survival (OS) was 2.1 months (min. 0.06 and max 33.2 months) and neurological progression-free survival was 1.73 months (min 0.03 and max 33.03 months). OS related to instituted therapy using COX regression analysis (yes versus no treatment) was 9.3 vs 1.9 months in ST group; 1.8 vs 2.4 months in intra-CT group; 3.0 vs 1.5 months in RT group. Comparative analysis of survival was performed by Kaplan-Meier curves. Median survival in the ST group was 2.53 months, combination of ST plus intra-CT was 1.44 months and BSC was 0.96 months. Clinical response, defined as neurological improvement and no new symptom, was assessed by Fischer's exact test. The group that matched clinical response was RT group (p<0.05). Factors of poor prognosis analyzed by univariate Cox regression were ECOG 2-4, liver metastasis and decreased level of consciousness (p<0.10).

Conclusions

Intrathecal chemotherapy did not improve symptoms and overall survival. Main prognostic factors observed were PS, liver metastasis and decrease level of consciousness.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.