Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

814P - Prevalence of HER2 overexpression and amplification in uterine cervical cancer: A systematic review and a meta-analysis

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Cervical Cancer

Presenters

Boris Itkin

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S725-S772. 10.1016/annonc/annonc703

Authors

B. Itkin1, S. Straminsky1, A. Garcia2, E.D. Adelchanow3, M. Pereyra1, G. Acosta Haab2, A. Bardach4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology, Hospital Juan A. Fernandez, C1425AGP - Buenos Aires/AR
  • 2 Oncology, Hospital Maria Curie, 1405 - Buenos Aires/AR
  • 3 Oncology, Hospital Nacional Profesor Alejandro Posadas, 1684 - Moron/AR
  • 4 Chronic Diseases, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS) - National Scientific and Technical Research Council, 1414 - Buenos Aires/AR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 814P

Background

The reported rates of HER2 positivity in uterine cervical cancer (CC) range from 0% to 87%. The importance of HER2 as an actionable target in CC would depend on HER2 positivity prevalence. We aimed to provide precise estimates of HER2 overexpression and amplification in CC globally and by relevant subgroups. We conducted a PRISMA compliant meta-analytic systematic review.

Methods

We searched Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and grey literature for articles reporting the proportion of HER2 positivity in CC. Studies that assessed HER2 status by immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization in invasive disease were eligible. We performed descriptive analyses of all 65 included studies. Of these, we selected 26 studies that used standardized American Society of Clinical Oncology / College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) Guidelines compliant methodology. We conducted several meta-analyses of proportions to estimate the pooled prevalence of HER2 positivity and subgroup analyses using geographic region, histology, tumor stage, primary antibody brand, study size, and publication year as moderators.

Results

The estimated pooled prevalence of HER2 overexpression was 5.7% (CI 95%: 1.5% to 11.7%) I2 = 87 % in ASCO/CAP compliant studies and 27.0%, (CI 95%: 19.9% to 34.8%) I2 = 96% in ASCO/CAP non-compliant ones, p < 0.001. The estimated pooled prevalence of HER2 amplification was 1.2% (CI 95%: 0.0% to 5.8%) I2 = 0% and 24.9% (CI 95%: 12.6% to 39.6%) I2 = 86%, respectively, p = 0.004. No other factor was significantly associated with HER2 positivity rates.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that a small but still meaningful proportion of CC is expected to be HER2 positive. High heterogeneity was the main limitation of the study. Variations in previously reported HER2 positivity rates are mainly related to methodological issues.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.