Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1745P - Prediction of BSRTC class of repeated FNA based on molecular testing result upon the first FNA

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Thyroid Cancer

Presenters

Yuntao Song

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S1205-S1210. 10.1016/annonc/annonc715

Authors

Y. Song1, G. Xu1, Y. Zhu2, T. Wang1, J. Liu3, W. Wang3, T. Ma3, B. Zhang1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Key Laboratory Of Carcinogenesis And Translational Research (ministry Of Education/beijing), Department Of Head And Neck Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 100142 - Beijing/CN
  • 2 Key Laboratory Of Carcinogenesis And Translational Research (ministry Of Education/beijing), Department Of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 100142 - Beijing/CN
  • 3 Department Of Translational Medicine, Beijing Genetron Health Genetic Technology Co., Ltd., 102206 - Beijing/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1745P

Background

According to the 2017 bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (BSRTC), a repeat FNA is recommended for cytologically ND/UNS nodules and some cytologically AUS/FLUS nodules as well. This study would explore correlation between molecular testing upon the first FNA and BSRTC class of repeated FNA (Re-FNA).

Methods

In the previous study, we conducted a prospective analysis of 383 thyroid nodule FNAB specimens evaluated using the BSRTC, and most of FNAB specimens underwent FSZ-Thyroid NGS Panel V1 molecular testing. Among them, 21 patients underwent repeated FNA, and the BSRTC class of Re-FNA and postoperative pathology (if any) were followed up.

Results

Among 21 patients who underwent Re-FNA, the BSRTC class of the first FNA was distributed in I (3, 14.3%), III (14, 66.7%) and IV (4, 19%), which accounted for 7.3% (3/41), 16.7% (14/84) and 25% (4/16) of corresponding BSRTC class, respectively. To be specific, 1 of 3 patients with BSRTC I nodules underwent upgrade to III upon repeated FNA; 11 of 14 BSRTC III nodules upgraded to V (3) and VI (8), respectively. As to BSRTC IV nodules, 1/4 upgraded to V upon repeated FNA. To explore the correlation between the result of molecular testing upon the first FNA and BSRTC class of repeated FNA, we made a contingency table (table) which showed that 90.9% (10/11) of patients with positive molecular testing result underwent upgrade of BSRTC class upon Re-FNA. As a comparation, only 30% (3/10) of patients with negative result underwent upgrade of BSRTC class. Interestingly, the only patient with a positive molecular testing result and non-upgrade of BSRTC class underwent surgery and the postoperative pathology of the patient was PTC. Table: 1745P

The contingency table

Molecular Testing Total
Positive Negative
Re-FNA Upgrade 10 3 13
Non-upgrade 1 7 8
Total 11 10 21

Note: Fisher's exact test p-value equals 0.0075.

Conclusions

Considering most upgrade being from III-IV to V-VI, the positive molecular testing result upon the first FNA might suggest not only the upgrade of BSRTC class upon repeated FNA but also necessity of surgery instead of Re-FNA in this situation.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.