Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

789P - PD-L1 and tumor mutational burden (TMB) in standard-of-care (SOC): Treated advanced cervical cancer

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Presenters

Min-Hyun Baek

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S725-S772. 10.1016/annonc/annonc703

Authors

M. Baek1, L. Chen2, P. Jelinic2, R. Cristescu2, X.Y. Jin2, C. Shao2, C. Tekin2, J. Park3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Obstetrics And Gynecology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, 14068 - Anyang/KR
  • 2 Medical Oncology, Merck & Co., Inc., 07033 - Kenilworth/US
  • 3 Department Of Obstetrics And Gynecology, Asan Medical Center - University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 138-931 - Seoul/KR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 789P

Background

We evaluated the prevalence and prognostic value of PD-L1 and TMB in SOC-treated advanced cervical cancer.

Methods

Patients had persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer diagnosed from January 2008 to December 2016 at Asan Medical Center in South Korea. Clinical data were retrospectively collected from medical records; archived tumor samples were tested in a central laboratory. PD-L1 expression by IHC was based on combined positive score (CPS) ≥1. TMB was assessed by whole exome sequencing with a cutoff of ≥175 mut/exome (equivalent to 10 mut/Mb by FoundationOne®CDx). OS was calculated from advanced diagnosis or 1L or 2L systemic therapy initiation until death or last follow-up. Association between OS and PD-L1 and TMB was analyzed using log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, stage, prior treatment, comorbidities, and other characteristics.

Results

Of 267 pts, 76.0% had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 24.0% adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma (AC/AS), 64.4% PD-L1 CPS ≥1, and 32.6% TMB ≥175 mut/exome. PD-L1 CPS ≥1 and TMB ≥175 mut/exome were more prevalent in SCC than in AC/AS (73.9% and 37.2% vs 34.4% and 17.7%). The most common 1L treatments were carboplatin/paclitaxel (62%), cisplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab (17%), and cisplatin/paclitaxel (12.6%). No pts received immunotherapy. There was no association between OS and PD-L1 (CPS ≥1 vs <1; adjusted HR [95% CI]: 1.09 [0.80-1.47] from advanced diagnosis; 1.05 [0.77-1.43] from 1L initiation; 1.04 [0.74-1.46] from 2L initiation). There was a negative association between OS and TMB (≥175 vs <175 mut/exome; adjusted HR [95% CI]: 1.27 [0.93-1.73] from advanced diagnosis; 1.45 [1.05-1.99] from 1L initiation; 1.54 [1.06-2.23] from 2L initiation). PD-L1 and TMB were not correlated (P=0.75). Similar results were seen in subgroups by histology, recurrent/metastatic disease, adjuvant treatment, or use of 1L bevacizumab.

Conclusions

In this retrospective analysis of pts with SOC-treated advanced cervical cancer, higher prevalence of PD-L1 CPS ≥1 and TMB ≥175 mut/exome was observed in SCC versus AC/AS. PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was not associated with OS; TMB ≥175 mut/exome may be associated with worse OS. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Medical writing and/or editorial assistance was provided by Dominic Singson, MD, and Holly Cappelli, PhD, CMPP, of the ApotheCom pembrolizumab team (Yardley, PA, USA). This assistance was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Funding

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Disclosure

L. Chen: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Merck; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Stocks/Shares: Merck. P. Jelinic: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Merck; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Stocks/Shares: Merck. R. Cristescu: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Patents Pending: Self. X.Y. Jin: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Merck. C. Shao: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Merck; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Stocks/Shares: Merck. C. Tekin: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Merck; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Stocks/Shares: Merck. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.