Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

269P - Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) with talazoparib (TALA) vs physician’s choice chemotherapy (PCT) in patients (pts) with HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm): Subgroup analysis of pts with and without TALA dose reductions vs PCT in the EMBRACA trial

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Hope Rugo

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S457-S515. 10.1016/annonc/annonc689

Authors

H.S. Rugo1, A. Niyazov2, H. Bhattacharyya3, B. Arondekar4, S.A. Hurvitz5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medicine (hematology/oncology), University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 94158 - San Francisco/US
  • 2 Oncology, Pfizer Inc, New York/US
  • 3 Biostatistics And Data Management, Pfizer Inc, New York/US
  • 4 Oncology, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville/US
  • 5 Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 269P

Background

In EMBRACA, TALA vs PCT demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival, a manageable adverse event (AE) profile, and quality of life (QoL) improvement. AEs were managed with supportive care and dose modifications. This post hoc analysis evaluated PROs in TALA pts without/with dose reductions vs PCT.

Methods

431 pts were randomized 2:1 to TALA (1 mg/d; n=287) or PCT (n=144); 52% of pts in the TALA arm had dose reductions (0.75 mg, 0.5 mg, or 0.25 mg). PROs were assessed at baseline, Day 1 of each 3 wk cycle, and end of treatment using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and BC module (BR23). Higher scores indicate better functioning or global health status (GHS)/QoL, or worse symptoms. PRO analyses included overall (longitudinal mixed effects model) mean change from baseline and time to definitive (TTD) clinically meaningful deterioration for TALA pts without/with dose reductions vs PCT. TTD was compared using a stratified log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Between arm overall change from baseline significantly favored TALA without/with dose reduction vs PCT in GHS/QoL, functional (physical, role, emotional, social), and symptom (fatigue, pain, insomnia, appetite loss) scales (Table). A delay in TTD was observed in GHS/QoL with TALA vs PCT in pts without (not reached vs 6.3 mo; hazard ratio [HR]=0.42 [95% CI: 0.26, 0.66]; P=0.0001) and with (16.9 vs 6.3 mo; HR=0.35 [0.22, 0.54]; P<0.001) dose reductions. Additional PRO results from the BR23 module will be presented. Table: 269P

Model estimated between arm overall change from baseline (EORTC QLQ-C30)

TALA without Dose reduction vs PCT P-Value TALA with Dose reduction vs PCT P-Value
GHS/QoL, & Function
GHS/QoL 9.4 <0.001 7.5 <0.001
Physical 10.5 <0.001 9.1 <0.001
Role 12.5 <0.001 11.7 <0.001
Emotional 8.3 0.001 5.9 0.028
Cognitive 2.8 0.247 6.9 0.006
Social 8.3 0.004 9.6 0.004
Symptom
Fatigue -13.1 <0.001 -11.0 <0.001
Pain -11.0 <0.001 -13.6 <0.001
Nausea/vomiting -4.5 0.099 -3.2 0.121
Dyspnea -6.4 0.015 -2.5 0.398
Insomnia -8.4 0.006 -7.6 0.005
Appetite loss -13.4 <0.001 -10.5 <0.001
Diarrhea -2.9 0.037 -2.1 0.192
Constipation -5.7 0.034 -3.9 0.211

Conclusions

In these subgroup analyses evaluating PROs in pts without/with TALA dose reductions vs PCT, improvement in GHS/QoL, and several functional and symptom scales were observed regardless of dose reductions.

Clinical trial identification

NCT01945775.

Editorial acknowledgement

Editorial support was provided by Jill Shults, PhD, of ICON plc (North Wales, PA, USA), and was funded by Pfizer Inc.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Pfizer Inc.

Funding

Pfizer Inc.

Disclosure

H.S. Rugo: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Pfizer Inc; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Merck; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Genentech; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Odonate; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Daiichi; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Seattle Genetics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Eisai; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Macrogenics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Sermonix; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Polyphor; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: PUMA; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Samsung; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Mylan; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Immunomedics. A. Niyazov, H. Bhattacharyya, B. Arondekar: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Pfizer Inc; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer Inc. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.