Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

752P - PARP-inhibitors beyond progression: A new way to manage oligometastatic ovarian cancer recurrence

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Presenters

Eleonora Palluzzi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S725-S772. 10.1016/annonc/annonc703

Authors

E. Palluzzi, C. Marchetti, S. Cappuccio, G. Avesani, A. Nardangeli, G. Scambia, A. Fagotti

Author affiliations

  • Dipartimento Di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino E Di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli-IRCCS, 00065 - Rome/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 752P

Background

The benefit of surgery and maintenance treatment with parp inhibitors (PARPi) has been recently shown in ovarian cancer (OC) recurrence. Also, the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is demonstrated in patients (pts) with metastatic, persistent, and recurrent OC. The management of oligometastatic progression (OMP) during PARPi maintenance is unclear and continuing the treatment beyond progression could be an option.

Methods

This is an observational, retrospective, single arm study. Pts affected by OC recurrence treated with PARPi in maintenance setting received surgery or SBRT, if OMP occurred. OMP was assessed by either Computed Tomography (CT)-scan or PET/CT scan, in case of isolated disease progression (one nodule), discrete diffusion (up to three nodules in different locations) or progression in “sanctuary” site. Maintenance treatment was continued until extensive progression of disease. Primary objectives of the study were: Progression Free Survival 1 (PFS1), defined as the time elapsed from the start of PARPi and OMP; post-progression-PFS (ppPFS), defined as the time elapsed from OMP and the last follow up (FU). Beyond-progression PFS (bpPFS), defined as the time elapsed from the start of PARPi and the extensive progression of disease or last FU (PFS1+ppPFS), and efficacy of surgery versus SBRT at OMP were secondary objectives.

Results

From June 2017 to December 2020 186 OC pts were treated with PARPi maintenance at recurrence. Of these 13% developed OMP (58% lymphnodes, 17% peritoneal, 25% visceral disease). Median age was 51 years. Olaparib and Niraparib were administered to 38% and 62% pts, respectively. Median PFS1 was 23 months [Confidence Interval (CI) 95% 11 – 34]. When OMP occurred, 38% and 62% pts were subjected to surgery and SBRT, respectively. Median ppPFS was 6 months (CI 95% 5 – 7). At the time of this publication 62.5% pts are still on treatment with PARPi beyond progression.

Conclusions

OC pts, who have an OMP during PARPi maintenance at recurrence, may continue to benefit from PARPi if combined with local treatment. Molecular assessment at oligometastatic and extensive progression could provide further information to define PARPi resistance mechanisms according to the type of disease progression.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.