Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1050P - Outcome and impact of immune related adverse events in patients with advanced melanoma treated with checkpoint inhibitors

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Clinical Research;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Melanoma

Presenters

Arkhjamil Angeles

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S867-S905. 10.1016/annonc/annonc706

Authors

A. Angeles1, K. Wind1, C. Tong1, D.G. Lee2, V. Bernstein3, C. Metcalf1, G. Bahl4, T.P. Nguyen4, K.J. Savage1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency - Vancouver, V5Z 4E6 - Vancouver/CA
  • 2 Mathematics And Statistics, St. Francis Xavier University, B2G 2W5 - Antigonish/CA
  • 3 Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency - Victoria, V8R 6V5 - Victoria/CA
  • 4 Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency - Abbotsford, V2S 0C2 - Abbotsford/CA

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1050P

Background

The impact of immune related adverse events (irAEs) on melanoma outcomes is unclear. We evaluated the survival of patients (pts) with locally advanced (LA)/metastatic melanoma (MM) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), as well as risk factors for and impact of irAEs.

Methods

Pts ≥18 years (y) with LA/MM who received ≥1 cycle of an ICI at BC Cancer from 2012-2019 were identified using the BC Cancer Registry and Pharmacy databases. IrAEs were graded using the CTCAEv5. A landmark analysis of pts progression-free at 20 weeks was performed.

Results

451 pts were identified: cutaneous (n=329, 73% [BRAF+ = 42%]), mucosal (n=30, 7%), ocular (n=41, 9%), and unknown (n=51, 11% [BRAF+ = 33%]) subtypes. With a median follow-up of 30 months (m), 2-y overall survival (OS) was 47%, 31%, 29%, and 60% per subtype, respectively (p<0.001). Combination ipilimumab/nivolumab (ipi/nivo), PD1 inhibitor alone (PD1), and ipilimumab alone (ipi) were given to 96 (21%), 275 (61%) and 80 (18%) pts, respectively. 2-y OS was superior for ipi/nivo vs PD1 (63% vs 49%, p=0.01), and remained significant when stratified by cutaneous/unknown (62% vs 53%, p=0.05) and mucosal (73% vs 21%, p=0.025). However, this difference was only observed in males (2-y OS 69% vs 47%, p=0.001; females, p=0.9). 62% of pts had ≥1 irAE: endocrine (21%), GI (20%), and skin (34%). Grade (gr) ≥3 irAEs by treatment were 46% (ipi/nivo) vs 11% (PD1) vs 15% (ipi), (p<0.001). Vitiligo (12%) was associated with improved OS (2-y OS 84% vs 41%, p<0.001). In a landmark 20-week analysis, OS was similar by irAE development (p=0.91). Gr ≥2 irAE was associated with normal LDH (82% vs 19%, p=0.01) and sex (male 69% vs female 31%, p=0.019) in ipi/nivo, but no risk factors were identified in PD1. Steroid use ≤2m before PD1 reduced irAE risk but also OS (p<0.0001) (including M1d, 2-y OS 57% vs 26%, p=0.016), an impact not observed with ipi/nivo (p=0.927).

Conclusions

Males have a higher risk of gr ≥2 irAEs and improved OS using ipi/nivo. Steroid use before ICI was associated with reduced toxicity and efficacy of PD1 inhibitor therapy, but not in those treated with ipi/nivo. Further studies that correlate biomarkers with irAE risk and outcome across ICI therapies are needed.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.