Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

63P - Obesity and sarcopenia as biomarkers for immunotherapy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Presenters

Sophie Günther

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S382-S406. 10.1016/annonc/annonc686

Authors

S.L. Günther1, P. Trinkner1, M. von Bergwelt2, D.M. Cordas dos Santos1, S. Theurich1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Cancer- And Immunometabolism Research Group, Gene Center LMU, 81337 - Munich/DE
  • 2 Department Of Medicine Iii, LMU University Hospital, 80539 - Munich/DE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 63P

Background

The role of overweight/obesity (ow/ob) and sarcopenia in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) continues to be debated. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published articles evaluating the effects of ow/ob and sarcopenia on survival and immune-related adverse events (irAEs).

Methods

According to Cochrane recommendations, systematic literature searches included all published articles in PubMed until February 2021 with key terms “obesity”, “overweight” and “sarcopenia” and ICI treatment irrespective of cancer entity and ICI used. Further selection criteria for meta-analysis included defined cut-offs for ow/ob and sarcopenia. For the random effects meta-analysis, we used Hazard Ratios (HR) for overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) and Odds Ratios (OR) for occurrence of irAEs.

Results

A total of 26 studies (8,034 patients) selected for ow/ob meta-analysis revealed a superior survival of ow/ob patients (PFS: HR 0.91, p = 0.15; OS: 0.73, p = 0.0002). In a subgroup analyses based on sex, only male patients benefitted from increased BMI, whereas ow/ob female patients had same survival probabilities compared to their normal weight counterparts. Ow/ob patients also had a higher risk of irAEs with grade ≥ 3 (OR 1.78, p = 0.02). In addition, 15 studies (1,428 patients) selected for sarcopenia meta-analysis showed a worse survival of sarcopenic patients (PFS: HR 1.53, p = 0.0001; OS: HR 1.6, p = 0.0005) with the same risk of developing irAEs.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis revealed that ow/ob is a beneficial factor for PFS and OS in a mixed cohort of cancer patients undergoing ICI treatment accompanied by an increased risk of severe irAEs. The differences between ow/ob males and ow/ob females might point to sex specific adipose distribution patterns. A significant number of studies included underweight patients into control groups which led to a compromised interpretation of the data and should be addressed in future studies. Sarcopenia as an established risk factor for conventional chemotherapy and surgical oncologic interventions seems to also hold true for ICI treatment.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Promotionsstipendium.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.