Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1552P - Magnitude of clinical benefit of cancer drugs used in advanced soft tissue sarcomas and GIST

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Soft Tissue Sarcomas;  GIST

Presenters

Raul Teres Lleida

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S1111-S1128. 10.1016/annonc/annonc712

Authors

R. Teres Lleida1, P. Cerda Serda1, B. Martin Cullell1, M. Borrell Puy1, A. Bujosa2, P. Gallardo Melo1, J. Gavira Diaz1, J.C. Tapia1, M. Aguado Sorolla1, A. Piedra1, A. Tibau1, A. Lopez Pousa1, A. Sebio Garcia1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Dept. Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 08041 - Barcelona/ES
  • 2 Dept. Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 08041 - Barcelona/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1552P

Background

The European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS) is a validated and reproducible tool to assess the magnitude of clinical benefit from drugs for solid tumors. Here, we evaluate characteristics and outcomes of clinical trials supporting drugs used in advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS) and GIST and their association with ESMO-MCBS.

Methods

We reviewed publications between January 1990 and December 2020 that support the recommendations of NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) guidelines version 1.2021 for treatment of advanced STS and GIST. We collected data on trial characteristics, efficacy, toxicity and quality of life (QoL). For each trial, ESMO-MCBS grades were applied. Substantial clinical benefit was defined as a grade 4 or 5 (in a scale from 1 to 5).

Results

Among the 23 trials for which the ESMO-MCBS could be applied (23/57 -40.4%-), 13 (56.5 %) were randomized controlled trials (RCT; 8 phase III and 5 phase II trials), and 10 (43.5%) were single arm trials. Eighteen (78.2%) involved STS and 5 (21.8%) GIST. Six trials (26.1% of all trials and 46.1% of RCT) demonstrated improvement in overall survival. QoL was reported in 7 (30.4%) trials. Among these, only 3 (42.9%) showed improvement in QoL. Only 9 (39.1 %) trials met the ESMO-MCBS substantial benefit threshold (5/18 involving STS and 4/5 involving GIST). Of these 9 trials, 8 (88.8%) were RCT (4 phase III and 4 phase II). All 3 trials that demonstrated improvement in QoL showed substantial benefit according to the scale.

Conclusions

Only 39.1% of trials supporting the use of drugs in patients with advanced STS and GIST meet the threshold for substantial benefit using ESMO-MCBS. These results suggest that randomized trials with QoL assessment are more likely to achieve the ESMO-MCBS substantial benefit threshold. Only a quarter of the trials showed improvement in OS.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding

Disclosure

A. Sebio Garcia: Other, Institutional, Other, Travel grants, Research grant and Teaching Honoraria: Pharmamar; Other, Institutional, Other, Travel grants: Amgen; Other, Institutional, Other, Travel grants: Sanofi. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.