Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

417P - Liquid biopsy driven anti-EGFR rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Marco Puzzoni

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S530-S582. 10.1016/annonc/annonc698

Authors

M. Puzzoni1, R. Giampieri2, S. Mariani1, P. Ziranu1, V. Pusceddu1, C. Donisi1, M. Persano1, G. Pinna1, E. Cimbro1, A. Parrino1, A. Pretta1, E. Lai1, N. Liscia1, A. Lupi2, E. Giglio2, G. Palomba3, M. Casula3, M. Pisano3, G. Palmieri3, M. Scartozzi1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, 09042 - Monserrato/IT
  • 2 Medical Oncology, AOU Ospedali Riuniti Ancona Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 - Ancona/IT
  • 3 Medical Oncology, Unit of Cancer Genetics, 7100 - Sassari/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 417P

Background

Rechallenge with EGFR inhibitors represents a promising strategy for patients (pts) with RAS wild type (WT) colorectal cancer (CRC) but definitive selection criteria are lacking. Recently the RAS WT status on circulating tumor DNA (ct-DNA) emerged as a potential watershed for this strategy. Our study explored the liquid biopsy driven anti-EGFR rechallenge in a RAS and BRAF WT selected population.

Methods

CRC pts with RAS and BRAF WT profile both on tumour tissue at diagnosis and on ct-DNA at baseline receiving rechallenge with anti-EGFR based regimens were eligible for our analysis. Ct-DNA was analyzed for RAS-BRAF mutations with pyro-sequencing (PyroMark Q24 MDx Workstation) and nucleotide sequencing (Genetic Analyzer ABI3130) assays. Real-time PCR (Idylla) and droplet digital PCR (QX200 System) were performed to confirm the RAS-BRAF mutational status. Several clinical variables were evaluated in relation to outcome. Statistical analysis was performed with MedCalc package version 14.10.2.

Results

A total of 26 pts receiving anti-EGFR rechallenge between July 2018 and February 2021 were included in our analysis. In the global population ORR was 25.0%, mOS was 5.0 months, mPFS was 3.5 months. Long anti-EGFR free interval, previous response to anti EGFR therapy and >2 previous lines for metastatic disease were associated with improved clinical outcome at univariate analysis. Prior responders with longer anti- EGFR free interval experienced the best clinical outcome (Table). In a multiple logistic regression model only the anti-EGFR free interval was confirmed to be a significant predictor for mOS (p:0.033) and mPFS (p:0.020). Table: 417P

ORR p PFS (months) HR p OS (months) HR p
Anti-EGFR free interval >14 months ≤14 months 36.4% 13.3% 0.350 7.0 3.0 0.27 0.013 13.0 5.0 0.28 0.019
Previous response to anti-EGFR prior responsers prior non-responders 25.0% 16.7% 1.000 5.0 2.0 0.26 0.048 7.0 5.0 0.57 0.333
Prior responders+anti-EGFR free interval>16 months yes no 57.1% 10.5% 0.027 not reached 3.0 0.14 0.0003 not reached 5.0 0.30 0.026
Previous lines for metastatic disease 2 >2 0.0% 25.0% 1.000 1.0 4.0 0.05 0.041 1.0 7.0 0.045 0.034

Conclusions

The liquid biopsy driven rechallenge strategy with anti-EGFR confirmed to be feasible in clinical practice. The clinical outcome resulted consistent with the literature data. In addition to the molecular selection through the analysis of ct-DNA for RAS, the long anti-EGFR free interval is confirmed as a prospective selection criterion for this therapeutic option.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Marco Puzzoni MD PhD.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

G. Palmieri: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS; MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Roche; Pierre-Fabre; Novartis; Incyte. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.