Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

301P - Integrins in different subsets of circulating tumor cells in breast cancer

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Cancer Biology

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Evgeniya Grigoryeva

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S457-S515. 10.1016/annonc/annonc689

Authors

E.S. Grigoryeva1, O.E. Savelieva2, V.V. Alifanov2, L.A. Tashireva2, M.V. Zavyalova2, N.A. Tarabanovskaya3, N.V. Cherdyntseva1, V.M. Perelmuter2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Molecular Oncology And Immunology, Cancer Research Institute Tomsk NRMC, 634009 - Tomsk/RU
  • 2 General And Molecular Pathology Department, Cancer Research Institute Tomsk NRMC, 634009 - Tomsk/RU
  • 3 General Oncology, Cancer Research Institute Tomsk NRMC, 634009 - Tomsk/RU

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 301P

Background

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are released from tumor tissue and provide tumor progression. The presence of stem and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) features in CTCs makes population extremely heterogenous and determines their invasiveness, adaptability to the microenvironment, and resistance to proapoptotic signals and chemotherapy. Integrins (ITGs), adhesion molecules, can determine organotropic metastasis when expressed on exosomes, as was shown in a study conducted by Hoshino A. et al. (2015). Herewith, as authors postulated, ITGB3 promoted brain metastasis, ITGB4 and ITGAvB5, lung and liver metastasis in vivo, correspondently. Here we assessed expression of 3 types of integrins on different subsets of CTCs.

Methods

The prospective study included 38 breast cancer patients with stage T2-4N0-3M0, admitted for treatment to Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk NRMC. CTCs phenotypes assessment was carried out by flow cytometry (Novocyte 3000, ACEA Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) using monoclonal antibody cocktail.

Results

Only 18 out 38 blood samples contained enough CTCs (CD45-Epcam+) for following analysis. Total CTC quantity detected in 18 blood samples was 314 cells per 1 ml of whole blood. We have previously shown the association of CD45-Epcam+CD44-CD24-N-cadherin+ CTCs (metastasis-associated CTCs, MA-CTCs) with the occurrence of distant metastases. In this study, MA-CTCs were detected in 27,78% of samples (5/18). Expression of ITGs was detected in 75% of MA-CTCs and in 69,6% of total CTCs. The incidence of ITGB4 expression was higher in MA-CTCs compared to the total CTC population (p=0.0014), while the expression of ITGB3 and ITGAvB5 was not statistically different. All of the MA-CTCs expressing ITGs possessed stemness features (CD133+ and/or ALDH1A1+). Positive expression of ALDH1A1 was observed in 83,3% of MA-CTCs), positive expression of CD133 was detected in 50% of MA-CTCs, while co-expression of both stem markers was observed in 33,3% MA-CTCs.

Conclusions

The detected MA-CTCs with stem-like features and positive ITGB4 expression in three patients allow us to expect lungs metastasis in follow-up period.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Tomsk National Research Medical Center.

Funding

The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant #21-15-00140).

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.