Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

683P - Impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) on outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Renal Cell Cancer

Presenters

Pier Vitale Nuzzo

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S678-S724. 10.1016/annonc/annonc675

Authors

P.V. Nuzzo1, E. Adib1, N. Weise2, C. Curran1, T. Stewart2, D. Freeman1, A.H. Nassar3, S. Abou Alaiwi1, Z. Bakouny1, B.A. McGregor1, T.K. Choueiri1, R.K. Jain4, R.R. McKay2, G.P. Sonpavde1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 02215 - Boston/US
  • 2 Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, 92037 - La Jolla/US
  • 3 Department Of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 02115 - Boston/US
  • 4 Department Of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 02114 - Boston/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 683P

Background

RASi have been shown to improve outcomes in studies of multiple malignancies by effects on the tumor microenvironment to enhance the immune repertoire and improve drug delivery. We evaluated the impact of RASi on outcomes in mRCC patients receiving ICI.

Methods

This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included mRCC patients treated with ICI with or without RASi. The patients from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) were used as a discovery cohort, and the patients from University of California San Diego (UCSD) were used for validation. Receipt of an ICI (PD1/L1 and/or CTLA-4 inhibitors) was required. RASi use was defined as receipt of a RASi at baseline and for a minimum of 30 days after ICI initiation. For both cohorts, the primary outcome assessed was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoints were time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and objective response rate (ORR). Propensity score matching was performed in both cohorts.

Results

Overall, 229 patients who received an ICI were included: 100 patients from DFCI and 129 patients from UCSD. Concomitant RASi were administered in 30 patients (30%) in the DFCI cohort and 59 (45%) in the UCSD cohort. Median age at ICI initiation was 62.5 years in both cohorts. Median follow-up was 3.8[IQR=3–5.3] years in the DFCI cohort, and 2.3[IQR=1.4–3.6] years in the UCSD cohort. In the DFCI cohort, RASi was significantly associated with longer OS (adjusted-HR=0.35 [95% CI: 0.17–0.70], P=0.003) and TTF (adjusted-HR = 0.57 [0.36–0.92], P=0.02). In the validation cohort, RASi was associated with TTF (adjusted HR=0.60 [0.39–0.92], P=0.02) and trended for association with OS (adjusted-HR=0.60 [0.34–1.06], P=0.07). The propensity analysis, matching 83 patients from both cohorts receiving RASi while on ICI with 83 who did not, showed that RASi significantly improved OS (HR=0.59 [0.37–0.95], P=0.03) and TTF (HR=0.60 [0.43–0.85], P=0.0034).

Conclusions

Repurposing RASi to treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improved OS and TTF coupled with tolerability and cost efficacy. This provides a rationale for prospective randomized studies combining ICI and RASi in mRCC patients.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.