Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1302P - Immune signatures of second-line PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Immunology;  Cancer Biology;  Translational Research

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Kenneth O'Byrne

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S949-S1039. 10.1016/annonc/annonc729

Authors

K.J. O'Byrne1, J. Monkman2, A. Mehdi3, N. Matigian3, A. Kulasinghe2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 4102 - Woolloongabba/AU
  • 2 Biomedical Science, Translational Research Institute, 4102 - Brisbane/AU
  • 3 Biostatistics, Queensland Cyber Infrastructure Foundation Ltd (QCIF), 4072 - Brisbane/AU

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1302P

Background

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related mortality in men and second cause of cancer mortality in women, with 5-year survival rates of 15%. Of these cases, durable responses to PD-1/PD-L1 directed immune checkpoint therapies are observed in only 20-30%. Both PD-L1 expression and tumour mutation burden are FDA approved diagnostic biomarker tests used to stratify patients for immunotherapy, however they perform poorly, indicating that much remains to be discovered regarding mechanisms that dictate therapy response. There remains a rneed for informative methods to analyse both cellular composition and spatial organisation in tissue beyond standard immunohistochemistry.

Methods

Here we examined the composition of patient tumours (n=41) from a second-line immunotherapy (IO) cohort using Nanostring spatial profiling (DSP). Over 1800 mRNAs and 70 proteins were analysed within separate tumour or stroma compartments of each TMA core, and our analysis utilised unbiases approaches to identify factors that may influence patient response.

Results

Differential analysis between responders and non-responders indicated several novel features. IL2 mRNA in stroma aswell as IL2 receptor (CD25) in both tumour and stroma were significantly upregulated in patients who responded (stroma IL-2, p=0.0004, tumour CD25, p=0.0095; stroma CD25, p=0.022). CD24 and JUP mRNA were significantly decreased in tumours of responding patients, while SHC3, SPP1, and MAGEA4 were significantly higher in stroma of these patients. In addition, IDO1 protein was significantly increased in stroma of non-responding patients, consistent with the role that the suppression of T-cell activation may have in dictating therapy response. CD44 protein was reduced in tumours of responding patients, which coincided with the significant increase of its extracellular matrix (ECM) ligand, SPP1 (osteopontin) in the stroma.

Conclusions

Overall, these data indicate the potential activation of stroma in responding patients, and is characterised by the enhanced interleukin (IL2, IL33) signalling activity which may act downstream of the changes in T-cell responses in the subset of patients who respond to PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.