Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1425P - Immune microenvironment and genomic alterations interpret heterogeneous response to immunotherapy in EBV-associated gastric carcinoma

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer

Presenters

Zhi Peng

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S1040-S1075. 10.1016/annonc/annonc708

Authors

Z. Peng1, T. Xie1, Y. Bai2, S. Tong3, X. Zhao4, Z. Bei5, F. Zhao3, J. Cai6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Gi Oncology, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142 - Beijing/CN
  • 2 Medical Marketing Department, 3D Medicines Inc., 201114 - Shanghai/CN
  • 3 Medical Affairs, 3D Medicines Inc. - Headquarter, 201114 - Shanghai/CN
  • 4 Medical Department, 3D Medicines Inc, 200000 - Shanghai/CN
  • 5 Department Of Medicine, 3Dmedcare, 200000 - Shanghai/CN
  • 6 Department Of Medicine, 3D Medicines Inc., 200000 - Shanghai/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1425P

Background

Epstein-Barr virus associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) is a distinct subtype of GC, whose response to immunotherapy were variable among cohorts. The ability and mechanisms of EBVaGC to benefit from immune checkpoint blockage (ICB) need to be clarified.

Methods

Twelve advanced EBVaGC received ICB, including eight patients treated with anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy and four treated in combination with anti-CTLA-4. Their response and survival outcome were evaluated and compared with 29 EBV-/Mismatch Repair deficient (dMMR) and 47 EBV-/MMR proficient (pMMR) GC patients treated with anti-PD-1/L1. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive value of EBV status in GC under ICB treatment. Tumor infiltrating immune cells were examined by mIHC, and gene mutation and copy number variation were analyzed by next generation sequencing, with tumor samples obtained prior ICB treatment.

Results

Twelve EBVaGC yielded an objective response rate of 41.7%. EBV+/pMMR patients had more favorable PFS and OS to EBV-/pMMR cohort (P<0.001; P= 0.015) and comparable result to EBV-/dMMR group (P = 0.79; P = 0.83). EBV status was independently associated with PFS (P =0.046) and OS (P =0.028). In EBVaGC treated with anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy, the density of CTLA-4 in both tumor (P =0.033) and stromal (P=0.008) were significantly higher in the non-response group. Interestingly, EBVaGC patients received dual ICB tended to have better prognosis than the patients under mono-immunotherapy (P =0.222). All the EBVaGC patients with SMARCA4 mutation attained PR (P=0.045) and had numeral longer PFS and OS than their wild-type counterpart (P =0.399; P =0.484). 13q12.12 deletion was enriched in non-response group (p=0.080) and a positive correlation was observed between the copy number of 13q12.12 and tumor regression (R2=0.58). Furthermore, patients with 13q12.12 deletion had unfavorable PFS and OS (P =0.070; P =0.332).

Conclusions

EBV status was a favorable biomarker for GC immunotherapy. EBVaGC may benefit more from anti-PD-1/L1 combined with anti-CTLA-4. SMARCA4 and 13q12.12 deletion were potential biomarkers of EBVaGC patients regarding to ICB.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.