Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

810P - Hormonal receptors in uterine leiomyosarcomas: How far is a primary tumor from multiple metastases?

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Gynaecological Malignancies

Presenters

Élia Cipriano

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S725-S772. 10.1016/annonc/annonc703

Authors

É. Cipriano1, P. Lopes2, S. Sousa3, M. Afonso2, C. Bartosch2, M.H. Abreu3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Unidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos, 4464-513 - Matosinhos/PT
  • 2 Pathology, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, 4200 - Porto/PT
  • 3 Medical Oncology, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, 4200 - Porto/PT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 810P

Background

Nearly half of uterine leiomyosarcomas (uLMS) express estrogen (ER) or progesterone (PR) receptors. Currently, few data accessed the concordance of hormonal receptor (HR) status in primary uLMS and metastasis. This study compares the expression of HR in primary and metastatic uLMS, as well as within different metastases of the same patient, addressing its prognostic value.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study (1980-2019) of all uLMS patients with recurrent/metastatic disease confirmed by histology (median follow-up 148.5 mo). Clinical files and histological slides were reviewed. ER/PR immunoexpression was assessed in primary and metastases samples, using a binary classification (+/-) and a semi-quantitative score by visual estimation (% positive tumor cells).

Results

Twenty-eight patients were included (near 30% of all uLMS patients treated). The most frequent site of the first relapse was the lung (n=18; 64.3%), and the median time to recurrence was 25.8 mo (95% CI 14.3-37.3). Most primary tumors were HR-positive (ER: n=20, 87.0%; PR: n=16, 69.6%), with a variable proportion of expression [median=30-40% (min-max: 0- 99%)]. Most had concordant binary HR expression with first recurrence/metastasis (n=15, 65.2%), while 8 had discordant results: 7 lost HR expression, 1 changed from negative to positive. Five that lost HR expression in metastasis had an HR expression score less than 40% in the primary tumor. Three showed discordant expression between metastases of the same patient. Treatment on relapse included surgical excision of metastasis (n=9, 32.1%), radiotherapy (n=5; 17.9%) and/or systemic therapy (n=21, 75.0%). HR loss in metastases (but not in primary tumors) tended to associate with worse progression-free survival, particularly PR (HR: 0.42, p=0.106). After metastatic disease onset, the median overall survival (OS) was 24.7 mo (95% CI 21.6-27.8). OS did not vary with HR expression.

Conclusions

Our study shows that HR expression discordance between primary and metastasis was present in 1/3 of uLMS. HR heterogeneity within same patient metastases was also observed. Metastasis HR expression seems to influence prognosis, warranting further confirmation in larger series and consideration in clinical trials design.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.