Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1734P - Genomic landscape of pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma tumors

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Mesothelioma

Presenters

Stefanie Hiltbrunner

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S1199-S1204. 10.1016/annonc/annonc730

Authors

S. Hiltbrunner1, Z. Fleischmann2, E. Sokol2, A. Curioni-Fontecedro3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology And Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, 8952 - Schlieren/CH
  • 2 Foundation Medicine, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge/US
  • 3 Department Medical Oncology And Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, 8091 - Zurich/CH

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1734P

Background

Malignant pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma are rare malignancies with unacceptable poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The genomic landscape of these diseases is mainly characterized by loss of tumor suppressor genes and mutations in DNA repair genes. Currently, data from next-generation sequencing (NGS) of mesothelioma tumors is restricted to a limited number of cases; moreover, data comparing molecular features of mesothelioma from pleural and peritoneal origin with NGS are lacking.

Methods

We analysed 1113 pleural mesothelioma and 355 peritoneal mesothelioma samples from patients sequenced through December 2020. All tumors were sequenced by NGS with the FoundationOne® or FoundationOne®CDx (Foundation Medicine) test for detection of substitutions, insertion-deletions, copy-number alterations and selected rearrangements in at least 324 cancer genes. Microsatellite instability was called on at least 95 loci and tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated on 0.8-1.2 Mb.

Results

This analysis revealed alterations in 65 genes with a prevalence higher than 2% of all patients. Alterations in BAP1, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, NF2, MTAP, TP53, and SETD2 occurred with a prevalence of at least 10%. Peritoneal, compared to pleural mesothelioma, was characterized by a lower prevalence of alterations in CDKN2A, CDKN2B and MTAP. Alterations in Hedgehog pathway-related genes (PTCH1/2 and SUFU) and Hippo pathway-related gene (NF2) as well as KRAS, EGFR, PDGFRA/B, ERBB2 and FGFR3 were detected in both cohorts. Table: 1734P

Peritoneal (n=355) Pleural (n=1113) p_val (fdr)
BAP1 47.9% 45.0% NS
CDKN2A 25.9% 48.2% <0.01
CDKN2B 19.4% 42.1% <0.01
MTAP 15.4% 32.3% <0.01
NF2 26.5% 32.8% <0.05
PBRM1 15.8% 6.8% <0.01
SETD2 10.4% 10.3% NS
TP53 14.9% 17.8% NS
Hedgehog pathway 1.1% 2.0% NS
Hippo pathway 29.0% 36.1% <0.05

Conclusions

Precision medicine has significantly improved the outcome of patients with cancer; molecular alterations, even if rare, may enable targeted treatment options. Here, we have analysed the largest cohort of patients with mesothelioma so far, for molecular aberrations by NGS. In a proportion of patients, alterations targetable with drugs available or under development were detected. These results suggest possible value for molecular profiling in mesothelioma.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

Z. Fleischmann: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Foundation Medicine; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Roche. E. Sokol: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: FoundationMedicine; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Roche. A. Curioni-Fontecedro: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bristol Meyer Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.