Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

251P - First-line treatments and clinical outcomes for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer: A systematic literature review

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Rose Chang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S457-S515. 10.1016/annonc/annonc689

Authors

R. Chang1, E. Law2, J. Xie1, A.S. Cha2, X. Chen1, H. Fang1, S.K. Kurosky2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Health Economics And Outcomes Research, Analysis Group, Inc., 02199 - Boston/US
  • 2 Patient & Health Impact, Oncology, Pfizer Inc., New York/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 251P

Background

A systematic literature review was conducted to summarize first-line (1L) treatments and clinical outcomes among patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor 2-positive (HER2+) advanced or metastatic breast cancer (aBC).

Methods

Clinical trials and real-world studies (RWS) published between 01/2000-12/2020 evaluating clinical outcomes of 1L treatments in adults with HR+/HER2+ aBC were identified through pre-specified searches in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and key conference proceedings. Study and patient characteristics, treatments (anti-HER2 therapy [AHT]+chemotherapy [CT], AHT+endocrine therapy [ET], ET only, and AHT only), treatment strategy (no induction vs. induction and maintenance), and outcomes (e.g., progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS]) were extracted and summarized.

Results

Overall, 20 trials and 21 RWS were identified. Among trials, treatments with AHT+CT (70%), AHT+ET (17%), ET only (10%), and AHT only (3%) were evaluated across 30 study arms. Fourteen of these study arms included induction and maintenance treatments, of which induction with AHT+CT (79%), CT only (14%), and AHT only (7%) were evaluated. Median PFS and OS ranged from 2.4-23.7 months and 23.9-66.7 months, respectively, in trials. Among RWS, AHT-based regimens (71%), ET alone (10%), CT alone (5%), or a combination (15%) were evaluated across 41 study arms. Eleven (27%) and 3 (7%) study arms assessed treatments in the induction and maintenance setting and with no induction therapy, respectively, while 27 (66%) could not be evaluated. Induction regimens used included AHT+CT (82%), AHT only (9%), and ET only (9%). Real-world median PFS and OS ranged from 4.8-29.0 months and 26.0-80.4 months, respectively. All studies measured PFS/OS from any 1L treatment initiation for aBC or earlier.

Conclusions

There is considerable variation in treatments and clinical outcomes in this patient population. Though most real-world patients with HR+/HER2+ aBC receive AHT-based regimens in the 1L setting, few also receive ET.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Pfizer Inc.

Funding

Pfizer Inc.

Disclosure

R. Chang: Other, Institutional, Other, Employee of Analysis Group, Inc. who were paid consultants to Pfizer in connection with the development of this abstract: Analysis Group Inc. E. Law, A.S. Cha, S.K. Kurosky: Other, Institutional, Other, Employee, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer Inc. J. Xie, X. Chen, H. Fang: Other, Institutional, Other, Employee of Analysis Group, which received funding from Pfizer for this project: Analysis Group, Inc.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.