Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

537P - Exposure-response analysis of cabozantinib in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated in routine care

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy;  Targeted Therapy

Tumour Site

Renal Cell Cancer

Presenters

Stefanie Krens

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S583-S620. 10.1016/annonc/annonc699

Authors

S.D. Krens1, N.P. van Erp1, S. Groenland2, D.J.A. Moes3, I.M.E. Desar4, S.F. Mulder4, T. Van Der Hulle5, N. Steeghs6, C.M. Van Herpen4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525 GA - Nijmegen/NL
  • 2 Department Of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital (NKI-AVL), 1066 CX - Amsterdam/NL
  • 3 Department Of Pharmacy, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC - Leiden/NL
  • 4 Department Of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA - Nijmegen/NL
  • 5 Department Of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC - Leiden/NL
  • 6 Department Of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital (NKI-AVL), 1066 CX - Amsterdam/NL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 537P

Background

In the registration trial, cabozantinib (cabo) exposure ≥750 μg/L correlated to improved tumor size reduction, response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients (pts). Because pts in routine care differ from pts in clinical trials, we explored the cabo exposure-response (E-R) relationship in mRCC pts treated in routine care.

Methods

Clinical data and cabo trough concentrations levels (Cmin) were collected from all mRCC pts treated with cabo with ≥1 measured Cmin at steady state in three Dutch hospitals. Based on Cmin and reported cabo treatment details, the average exposure over the duration of treatment (ODT) was calculated for each patient. E-R analyses were performed using the Cmin threshold of >750 μg/L and median Cmin ODT for PFS. In addition, we explored the effect of dose reductions on PFS.

Results

In total 59 pts were included: 10% were favourable, 61% intermediate and 17% poor IMDC risk group, respectively. Median number of prior treatment lines was 2 (0-5). Starting dose was 60 mg in 46%, 40 mg in 42% and 20 mg in 12% of pts. Dose reductions were needed in 58% of pts. Forty one pts discontinued cabo of whom 29 were due to progressive disease. Median Cmin ODT was 572 μg/L (IQR 496-701). Only 17% of pts had a Cmin ODT ≥750 μg/L. Median PFS was 52 wks (95%CI 40-64). No improved PFS was observed for pts with a Cmin ODT ≥750 μg/L vs. <750 μg/L (19 vs. 52 wks, p=.2). A trend for longer PFS was observed for pts with a Cmin ODT <572 μg/L vs. those with ≥572 μg/L (65 vs. 42 wks, p=.055). A prolonged PFS was observed in pts who received a dose reduction vs. those who did not (65 vs. 31 wks, p=.001). After incorporating known covariates [IMDC risk group and prior treatment lines (<2 vs. ≥2)] in the multivariable analysis, the need for dose reduction remained significantly associated with improved PFS (HR 0.32, 95%CI 0.15-0.70, p=.004).

Conclusions

This exploratory study in routine care mRCC pts showed that the average cabo exposure was below the target of 750 μg/L in 83% of pts. No improved PFS was observed for pts with an exposure above the target of 750 μg/L or above the median exposure of 572 μg/L. Interestingly, a significantly longer PFS was observed for pts who received a dose reduction.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Radboud University Medical Center.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

N.P. van Erp: Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Astellas; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Janssen-Cliag; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Pfizer; Other, Institutional, Advisory Board: Pfizer; Other, Institutional, Other, Honoraria: Bayer; Other, Institutional, Other, Honoraria: Sanofi. I.M.E. Desar: Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis. S.F. Mulder: Other, Institutional, Other, Honoraria: Pfizer; Other, Institutional, Other, Honoraria: Roche; Other, Institutional, Other, Honoraria: Merck Sharp an Dohme; Other, Institutional, Other, Honoraria: Bristol Meyers Squibb. N. Steeghs: Other, Institutional, Other, Honoraria: Boehringer Ingelheim; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca/MedImmune; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Bayer; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Bristol Meyers Squibb; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: GlaxoSmithKline; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Boehringer Ingelheim; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Blueprint Medicines; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: AB Science; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Deciphera; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Genetech; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Merck Sharp and Dohme; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Merus; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Lilly; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Incyte. C.M. Van Herpen: Other, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Bristol Meyers Squibb; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Merck Sharp and Dohme; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Merck; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Ipsen; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Sanofi; Other, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis; Other, Institutional, Advisory Board: Bayer; Other, Institutional, Advisory Board: Bristol Meyers Squibb; Other, Institutional, Advisory Board: Ipsen; Other, Institutional, Advisory Board: Merck Sharp and Dohme; Other, Institutional, Advisory Board: Regeneron. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.