Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

855P - Exploring the cardio-cerebrovascular outcomes and thromboembolic risks among BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms treated with ruxolitinib: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy

Tumour Site

MDS/MPN/Others

Presenters

Boby Pratama Putra

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S773-S785. 10.1016/annonc/annonc676

Authors

B.P. Putra1, F.N. Putra2

Author affiliations

  • 1 General Practitioner, Medical Doctor, 66121 - Blitar/ID
  • 2 Faculty Of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya/ID

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 855P

Background

Recent studies suggested any cardio-cerebrovascular and thromboembolic events in BCR-ABL1-negative MPN (essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythaemia vera (PV), and myelofibrosis) patients treated with ruxolitinib (RUX), a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, although the results were still inconsistent. This study aims to compare the cardio-cerebrovascular events and thromboembolic incidences in BCR-ABL1-negative neoplasms patients treated with RUX and the best available therapy (BAT).

Methods

We performed comprehensive searching in several online databases to include all relevant studies from 2000 until 2021. We followed the PRISMA guideline for conducting this study. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the cardio-cerebrovascular events and thromboembolic incidences in ET, PV, and myelofibrosis, treated with RUX compared with BAT. We used the Cochrane Risk-of-bias instrument for accessing bias risks. We performed analysis to provide pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using random-effect heterogeneity test.

Results

We included 12 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. The RUX group has non-significant increased risks of myocardial infarction RR=1.91, 95%CI 0.71-5.16, p=0.20, I2=0%), new-onset hypertension (RR=1.58, 95%CI 0.69-3.61, p=0.28, I2=0%), ischemic stroke (RR=2.01, 95%CI 0.38-10.73, p=0.41, I2=0%), haemorrhagic stroke (RR=2.17, 95%CI 0.33-14.22, p=0.42, I2=0%), but has decreased arrhythmia risk (RR=0.64, 95%CI 0.22-1.85, p=0.41, I2=0%) compared with BAT. There are no significant differences between RUX and BAT groups for the pulmonary embolism, thrombosis of the deep vein, retinal vein, portal vein, and spleen, also thrombophlebitis. The overall analysis showed that RUX has increased thromboembolism risks although not statistically significant (RR=1.24, 95%CI 0.57-2.69, p=0.58, I2=20%).

Conclusions

Ruxolitinib tends to increase the cardio-cerebrovascular events and thromboembolism risks in BCR-ABL1-negative MPN patients. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to establish the outcomes and comparisons.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.