Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

626P - Estimation of overall survival with subsequent treatment effect by applying inverse probability of censoring weighting in the LATITUDE study

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Nobuaki Matsubara

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S626-S677. 10.1016/annonc/annonc702

Authors

N. Matsubara1, Y. Koroki2, M. Taguri3, K. Fizazi4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 277-8577 - Kashiwa/JP
  • 2 Medical Affairs Division, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., 101-0065 - Chiyoda-ku/JP
  • 3 Graduate School Of Data Science, Yokohama City University, 236-0027 - Yokohama/JP
  • 4 Department Of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, 94805 - Villejuif/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 626P

Background

In the LATITUDE study, abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) added to androgen deprivation therapy demonstrated significant overall survival (OS) benefit in patients with high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), compared with placebo (PBO). Around 60% of patients received life-extending subsequent therapies (LEST) after PBO discontinuation. To our knowledge, this is the first analysis to estimate the real treatment effect adjusting for patients without LEST.

Methods

We conducted a post-hoc analysis of data from the LATITUDE study, applying intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and a naïve-censoring and inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) methods to the PBO group to reveal the proportion of LEST in patients with PBO. In a naïve-censoring approach, patients who did not receive LEST were censored at the date of protocol treatment discontinuation. The IPCW method in this study could represent conditions in which all patients had switched to LEST, unless they died possibly related to protocol treatment, adjusted by baseline and time-varying covariates. The OS hazard ratio (HR) of AAP versus PBO and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Of 581 patients in the PBO group eligible for LEST, 344 (59.2%) patients received LEST. OS results per the ITT analysis, naïve-censoring method, and IPCW method are shown in the table. The naïve-censoring method and IPCW method provided smaller but significantly better treatment effect estimate than the ITT estimate. Table: 626P

Method Median OS, months (95%CI) HR (95%CI)
AAP (n=597) PBO (n=602)
ITT analysis 53.3 (48.2-not estimable) 36.5 (33.5-40.0) 0.66 (0.56-0.78)
Naïve-censoring method Same as ITT analysis 40.5 (36.5-46.8) 0.74 (0.63-0.88)
IPCW method Same as ITT analysis 38.9 (35.4-44.7) 0.73 (0.61-0.86)

Conclusions

Treatment with AAP continued to demonstrate significant and clinically meaningful survival benefit over PBO in patients with high-risk mCSPC, regardless of receiving LEST in the PBO group.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.

Disclosure

N. Matsubara: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Takeda; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Astellas; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Chugai; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Bayer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Ono; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Taiho; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Pfizer. Y. Koroki: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. K. Fizazi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Astellas; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: AAA; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Bayer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Clovis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Curevac; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: ESSA; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Genentech; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Orion; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Sanofi. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.