Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

969P - Effect of angiotensin II inhibition on non-small cell lung cancer response to immune checkpoint blockers

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Targeted Therapy;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Presenters

Patricia Pereira

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S829-S866. 10.1016/annonc/annonc705

Authors

P.M. Pereira1, S.C. Ferreira1, T. Almodovar2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E. (IPO Lisboa), 1099-023 - Lisbon/PT
  • 2 Pneumology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E. (IPO Lisboa), 1099-023 - Lisbon/PT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 969P

Background

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is an important signaling system within the tumor microenvironment, promoting both malignant and stromal cell proliferation. Angiotensin II (AngII) is the main effector hormone, acting predominantly by the signaling of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R). Preclinical data show that AngII increases TGF-β production through AT1R signaling and decreases TGF-β through AT2R signaling. Thus, the overlap of these pathways may have a critical role in carcinogenesis, as well as immune evasion and inhibiting AT1R may enhance clinical responses in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Here we report efficacy of ICI in patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) concomitantly taking RAS inhibitors (RASi).

Methods

We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis of NSCLC pts treated with ICI from September 2015 to August 2019. Clinical data was collected and groups were defined as pts treated with Ang receptor blockers (ARBs), Ang converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or none (control) at the time of ICI initiation. Statistical analyses were performed using Cox regression method.

Results

In total, 127 pts with NSCLC were included, where 15 (11.8%) were concomitantly taking ARBs and 20 (15.7%) ACEi. Baseline characteristics were similar in all groups. The ARB group had a prolonged median PFS and OS compared to the control group (HR 0.401, 95%CI 0.174-0.929 and HR 0.438, 95%CI 0.189-1.015, respectively). Interestingly, no statistically impact in PFS (HR 0.872, 95%CI 0.460-1.654) or OS (HR 0.747, 95%CI 0.393-1.419) was observed in ACEi group compared with control group. ARB use was also associated with an increase in ORR (26.7%), in contrast ACEi use was not associated with ORR improvement (12.5%) when compared with pts not taking RASi (14.9%).

Conclusions

Concomitant ARB use was associated with an improvement in PFS, OS and near doubling in ORR with ICI. This same benefit was not seen with ACEi. This discrepancy may be due to selective blockade of AT1R by ARBs. Thus, ARBs prescription concomitant to ICI seems to be associated with better outcomes and tumor response in pts with NSCLC. These results should be validated in prospective trials.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.