Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1450P - Criteria for referral of cancer patients to palliative care in Indian hospitals: A modified Delphi consensus

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

End-of-Life Care

Tumour Site

Presenters

Gaurav Chanana

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S1076-S1083. 10.1016/annonc/annonc679

Authors

G. Chanana1, M. Pruthi2, N. Salins3, R. Arora1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Division Of Pain & Palliative Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, 110017 - New Delhi/IN
  • 2 Division Of Pain & Palliative Medicine, Max Superspeciality Hospital Vaishali, 201012 - Ghaziabad/IN
  • 3 Department Of Palliative Medicine & Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College, 576104, - Manipal/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1450P

Background

Globally, referral of cancer patients for palliative care is often patchy and delayed. A recent review synthesized the barriers to timely engagement of the palliative care team: absence of dedicated palliative teams, stigma with referral, presuppositions of oncologists, lack of clarity in referral criteria, etc. Guidelines from international societies like NCCN, WHO, ESMO may not completely apply to the Indian setting due to social differences and heterogenous health care systems. Our aim was to understand the views of our oncologists and use that to develop local referral guidelines for palliative care.

Methods

The setting was a chain of nine tertiary care private hospitals in North India. A preliminary list of 22 “Criteria for referral to Palliative Care” was created after discussing the relevant published literature and guidelines by the study team. This list was then sent to consultant oncologists (n=85) who were invited to take part in two rounds of modified Delphi method to achieve a consensus. Level of agreement to each statement was on a Likert scale of 1 “strongly disagree” to 9 “strongly agree”. Consensus was decided a priori as a score of ≥ 7 by more than 80% of the respondents.

Results

Consensus was achieved for 14 of the referral criteria in the first round. Of the remaining eight criteria, six were dropped, and two were revised and sent for the second round. Both the revised criteria in the second round did not achieve consensus. Response rates for round one was (63/ 85) 74% and round two was (41/ 85) 48%. Criteria for referral of cancer patients to palliative care include stage 4 cancer, brain or leptomeningeal disease, failed second or more lines of treatment, multiple comorbidities/symptoms affecting further cancer directed treatment/ QOL, life expectancy < 6 months, ECOG≥3, pain, high symptom burden, distress score ≥ 4/10, family/ patient’s request for palliative care, or hastened death, refusal to treatment and patients requiring end of life care planning.

Conclusions

Using the modified Delphi method, we achieved consensus among our oncologists on the criteria for referral to palliative care. These would now be part of institutional guidelines and would initiate discussions for appropriate palliative care referrals.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.