Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1204P - Cost-benefit analysis of ALK diagnosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer in Spain

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Ana Laura Ortega Granados

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S949-S1039. 10.1016/annonc/annonc729

Authors

A.L. Ortega Granados1, F. Rojo Todo2, R. Álvarez Álvarez3, M. Majem Tarruella4, L. Ruiz de Alda Iparraguirre5, J..F. García Verdes-Montenegro6, R. Gordo Flores6, A. González-Domínguez7, Y. Ivanova Markova7, R. Sánchez San Cristóbal7

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Jaén, 23007 - Jaén/ES
  • 2 Pathological Anatomy, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, 28040 - Madrid/ES
  • 3 Medical Oncology, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, 28007 - Madrid/ES
  • 4 Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 08041 - Barcelona/ES
  • 5 Corporate Affairs, Roche, 28042 - Madrid/ES
  • 6 Medical Department, Roche, 28042 - Madrid/ES
  • 7 Pharmacoeconomics And Market Access, Weber, 28014 - Madrid/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1204P

Background

In recent years, target therapies to specific molecular alterations present in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have been discovered and have shown superior efficacy compared to non-targeted treatments. Among the molecular alterations identified in NSCLC, the anaplastic lymphoma tyrosine kinase (ALK) receptor, present in 3.4% of patients, is one of the therapeutic targets. The aim of this study was to estimate in monetary terms the value of the benefit of ALK diagnosis in NSCLC in Spain.

Methods

A cost-benefit analysis was performed from the Spanish societal perspective with a 5-year time horizon, comparing the benefit of ALK diagnosis of NSCLC patients versus no diagnosis. Direct health care costs (DHC) (diagnosis, treatment, resource use and adverse events [AE]), direct non-health care costs (formal and informal care and travel for visits and drug administration) and indirect costs (work productivity losses [WPL] to attend visits and follow-up tests) were included. Benefits, positives and negatives, included were the stigma of a lung cancer diagnosis, quality of life (QoL) losses associated with progression and mortality, caregiver QoL, AE, time for family enjoyment, and WPL due to sick leave and premature death. The result was tested using a deterministic sensitivity analysis.

Results

An increase of €10.09m is obtained in the ALK diagnostic arm compared to the non-diagnostic arm. The cost of administration, the DHC of treating AE and the cost of formal and informal care generate savings of €265,774, €625,958 and €1.1m respectively. A benefit of €11.71m is obtained as the benefits are higher in the ALK diagnostic arm than in the non-diagnostic arm. This derives from higher patient survival and consequently lower QoL and WPL, less stigma and less loss of time for family enjoyment. The cost-benefit ratio is €1.16 (€0.90 - €2.15: the worst and the best scenario), so that for every euro invested, a social benefit of €1.16 would be obtained.

Conclusions

The results suggest that ALK diagnosis in NSCLC will not only allow patients to be treated with targeted therapies, but will also generate a benefit for Spanish society that outweighs its costs. This justifies the universal application of this diagnosis.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Weber.

Funding

Roche.

Disclosure

A.L. Ortega Granados: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche. F. Rojo Todo: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche. R. Álvarez Álvarez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche. M. Majem Tarruella: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche. A. González-Domínguez: Financial Interests, Institutional, Other: Roche. Y. Ivanova Markova: Financial Interests, Institutional, Other: Roche. R. Sánchez San Cristóbal: Financial Interests, Institutional, Other: Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.