Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

CN10 - Congruence between actual and preferred place of death by patients with oncological disease in palliative care and their caregivers in a primary care district of Cadiz

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management;  End-of-Life Care;  Patient Education and Advocacy

Tumour Site

Presenters

Jose Manuel Martinez Nieto

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S1260-S1260. 10.1016/annonc/annonc691

Authors

J.M. Martinez Nieto1, C. Sancho-Salvatierra2, A. Delgado-Romero3, M.J. Gomez-Plana4, M.D.M. Leon-Grima3, L. Arias-Velarde3, P. Ruiz-Cayuso3, C. Tello-Meneses3, M.A. Ramirez-Castillo3, J. Fernandez-Rodriguez3, F. Moreno-Castro3, J.A. Rubio-Muñoz3, F.J. Perez-Cabezas3, L. Diaz-Martinez3, M.I. Barberan-Montiano3, B. Ardaiz-Flamarique3, J.M. Caparros-Garcia3, A.D. Romero3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Nursing And Physiotherapy, Faculty Of Nursing And Physiotherapy, University of Cádiz, 11009 - Cadiz/ES
  • 2 Department Of Nursing And Physiotherapy, Faculty Of Nursing And Physiotherapy, Biomedical Research Management Foundation of Cádiz, 11009 - Cadiz/ES
  • 3 Distrito De Atencion Primaria Bahia De Cadiz- La Janda, SAS - Servicio Andaluz de Salud, 11006 - Cadiz/ES
  • 4 Atencion Primaria, SAS - Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Cadiz/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract CN10

Background

The literature reviewed show discord between the preferences of place of death expressed by people in Palliative Care and the actual place of death. It is necessary to analyze this situation, highlighting the importance of the wishes and preferences of patients and their caregivers.

Methods

Study design: longitudinal, prospective single-cohort, analytical. 427 people were studied in 2018 in the Bahia de Cadiz-La Janda District (Andalusia, Spain). Among other variables, this investigation studied the preferences of place of death expressed by the patient and their caregiver (home, hospital or undefined) during the initial evaluation (IE) and Last Days and Hours of Life (LDHL), as well as the actual place of death (home or hospital).

Results

52.2% of patients died at home and 47.8% died in the hospital. The place preferred by patients and caregivers is home, which is the case both at the time of the IE (Patient: 36.5% home, 11.8% hospital and 51.8% undefined; Caregiver: 40.3%, 21.3% and 38.4%) and LDHL (Patient: 41.9%, 15.9% and 42.2%; Caregiver: 51.2%, 32.0% and 16.8%). (See Table) A significant association is found (p<0.05) between the preference stated during IE and during LDHL and the actual place of death, both for the patient (59.5% and 81.3% congruence, respectively) and the caregiver (68.9% and 87.7%). This relationship is more intense in the case of the wishes expressed during LDHL, both by the patient (59.9% vs 81.3%) and the caregiver (68.9% vs 87.7%), and more intense in the case of the caregiver’s preference (87.7%) than that of the patient (81.3%). Table: CN10

Congruence between actual and preferred place of death by patient and caregiver at time of initial evaluation (IE) and last days and hours of life (LDHL)

General congruence Sig. Kappa Sig.
Patient at IE 59,5% p <0,034 0,150 p = 0,017
Caregiver at IE 68,9% p <0,001 0.357 p <0,001
Patient in LDHL 81,3% p <0,001 0,600 p <0,001
Caregiver in LDHL 87,7% p <0,001 0,746 p <0,001

Conclusions

There is a significant relationship/congruence between the actual and preferred place of death by patients and caregivers. This relationship is stronger in the case of preferences during LDHL and for caregivers, which must be taken into consideration when planning care prior to death.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Biomedical Research Management Foundation of Cádiz (INiBICA). Project subsidized within the framework of the Integrated Territorial Initiative (ITI) 2014-2020 for Cádiz by the Andalusian Consejería de Salud and by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER)

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.