Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

809P - Comprehensive characterization of molecular features distinguishing uterine leiomyoma from leiomyosarcomas

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Endometrial Cancer

Presenters

Xudong Liu

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S725-S772. 10.1016/annonc/annonc703

Authors

X. Liu1, X. Peng2, T. Sun1, X. Wei2, X. Guo2, H. Li2, H. Yang1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Obstetrics And Gynecology, PUMCH - Peking Union Medical College Hospital/Beijing Xiehe Hospital - Dongdan Campus, 100730 - Beijing/CN
  • 2 Scientific, Precision Scientific (Beijing) Co., Ltd., 100085 - Beijing/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 809P

Background

Uterine leiomyosarcomas (LMS) is a highly aggressive but rare uterine tumor. However, it is almost impossible to distinguish LMS from the most common benign uterine leiomyomas (LM) through pre-operative diagnosis, leading to poor prognosis of LMS patients. Thus, it is clinically important to identify molecular differences between LMS from LM, which would not only advance our understanding on tumorigenesis of LMS but also lay a foundation for developing effective early detection strategy.

Methods

We performed whole-exome sequencing from 78 LM and 10 LMS treatment-naïve tumor samples along with their matched normal samples as well as RNA-sequencing on 4 LM and 10 LMS samples. We employed a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis based on WES and RNAseq data to identify differential molecular features between the two diseases.

Results

We find that TP53 loss-of-function mutations are exclusively observed in LMS (5 out of 10 LMS samples, 0 out of 78 LM samples; Fisher’s exact test, p = 5.8x10-5), whereas MED12, a cervical cancer driver gene, is significantly mutated in LM group (1 out of 10 LMS samples, 37 out of 78 LM samples; Fisher’s exact test, p = 3.9×10-3). LMS tumors harbor a higher tumor mutation burden (p = 2.2×10-6, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Compared with LM, mutational Signature 5, 7, 10 show relatively higher contributions in LMS (Signature 5, Age, p = 2.0×10-2; Signature 7, Ultraviolet, p = 2.1x10-3; Signature 10, POLE, p=3.5×10-3; two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test). LMS tumors also show much significantly higher fractions of loss of heterogeneity (LOH, p=1.2×10-5, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test), suggesting the genome-wide instability. We also noted the well-known cancer hallmark genes are consistently upregulated in LMS, including EGFR, BRAF, PIK3CA, PIK3CB, JAK1/2 and MTOR (|log2FC| > 1, FDR < 0.05). Consistent with the Signature 7 signal, UV_response_DN pathway is significantly upregulated in LMS.

Conclusions

Using unbiased genome-wide molecular profiling data, we identified the mutation and gene expression features that distinguish LMS from LM. LMS appears to be more driven by TP53 mutations, accompanied with genome-wide instability and cancer-hallmark pathway dysregulation.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

H. Yang.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.