Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1354P - Comparison of different hyperprogressive disease criteria in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immunotherapy and correlation with somatic mutations in driver genes

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Miren Zuazo

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S949-S1039. 10.1016/annonc/annonc729

Authors

M. Zuazo1, H. Arasanz2, L. Chocarro3, A.I. Bocanegra Gondan1, M. Martínez-Aguillo2, I. Morilla Ruiz2, L. Teijeira2, D. Guerrero4, L.M. Nova4, T. Zudaire4, M. Arriola4, A. Patiño-Garcia5, R. Pío5, G. Kochan1, D. Escors1, R. Vera6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncoimmunology, Navarrabiomed, 31008 - Pamplona/ES
  • 2 Dept. Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra - Royal Navarre Hospital, 31008 - Pamplona/ES
  • 3 Oncoimmunology Unit, Navarrabiomed, 31008 - Pamplona/ES
  • 4 Pathology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra - Royal Navarre Hospital, 31008 - Pamplona/ES
  • 5 Program In Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Pamplona/ES
  • 6 Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra - Royal Navarre Hospital, 31008 - Pamplona/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1354P

Background

Our group recently found an association between a burst of highly differentiated CD4+ cells (CD4 THD burst) between the first and second cycle of immunotherapy and hyperprogressive disease (HPD) in a cohort of pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients [Arasanz H et al, Cancers (Basel) 2020]. We have expanded this cohort, compared the incidence of HPD using the different radiological criteria and our CD4 THD burst, evaluated the outcomes and correlated this information with somatic mutations detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in tumor samples.

Methods

We recruited 90 NSCLC patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy after progression to platinum-based chemotherapy. Lymphocytes were purified by Ficoll gradient before each cycle and analyzed by flow cytometry. HPD was identified by TGKR ≥ 2 (Sâada-Bouzid E, et al. Ann Oncol 2017), TGR ≥ 2 (Champiat S, 2017), time-to-failure (TTF) ≤ 2 months and CD4 THD burst > 1.3 [Arasanz H, et al. Cancers (Basel) 2020)]. Somatic mutations in tumor samples were analyzed using the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay.

Results

72 patients were evaluable for radiological HPD. Incidence was 20.8% by TGKR and 19.4% by TGR. 79 patients were evaluable for CD4 THD burst, and incidence was 21.5%. 40% of patients had time to treatment failure (TTF) ≤ 2 months. HPD was associated with lower PFS (TGKR 6.3 vs 12.4 wks, p < 0.001; TGR 6.3 vs 10.9 wks, p < 0.001; TTF 5.7 vs 17.3 weeks, p < 0.001; CD4 THD 7.0 vs 9.3 wks, p=0.001). Patients with TTF < 2 months had worse OS (15.1 vs 69.6, p < 0.001). A trend was found for TGKR (23.7 vs 54.7, p=0.1), TGR (18.7 vs 52.4, p=0.1) and CD4 THD (13.9 vs 43.9 wks, p=0.09). A strong agreement was found between TGKR and TGR (κ=0.871), while only fair agreement with CD4 THD burst or TTF < 2 months was detected (κ=0.2 - 0.3). TP53 mutations were found in 71% of HPD by TGR and TGKR, while they were 39% in the rest of the cohort. ARID1A mutations were found in 29% of HPD by TGR and TGKR, while they were 9% in the rest of the cohort.

Conclusions

The different HPD criteria identified a subgroup of patients with shorter PFS and OS. A strong agreement between TGKR and TGR was found. TP53 and ARID1A mutations were more frequently detected among HPD patients, although their role in this phenomenon is still unclear.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

IdiSNA.

Funding

Gobierno de Navarra, Direción General de Industria, Energía e Innovación; Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (AECC).

Disclosure

H. Arasanz: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.