Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1326P - Combination of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with anti-PD-1 in oligoprogressive disease: Final results of a prospective multicenter study

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Clinical Research;  Immunotherapy;  Radiation Oncology

Tumour Site

Melanoma;  Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Juan Zafra Martín

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S949-S1039. 10.1016/annonc/annonc729

Authors

J. Zafra Martín1, R. Chicas Sett2, D. Rodriguez3, J. Castilla Martinez4, B. Salas2, A. Vera2, G. Benítez3, M. Lloret2, J.L. Onieva5, I. Barragan5, P.C. Lara6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Cancer Molecular Biology Group, Section Of Immuno-oncology, Medical Research Center (CIMES), University of Malaga (UMA), Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 - Málaga/ES
  • 2 Radiation Oncology, Dr Negrin University Hospital of Gran Canaria, 35019 - Las Palmas de Gran Canaria/ES
  • 3 Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular-Materno Infantil, 35016 - Las Palmas de Gran Canaria/ES
  • 4 Radiation Oncology, IMED Hospitales, 30110 - Murcia/ES
  • 5 Department Of Medical Oncology, Section Of Immuno-oncology, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria University Hospitals, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 - Málaga/ES
  • 6 Oncology, San Roque University Hospital, 35001 - Las Palmas de Gran Canaria/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1326P

Background

The aim of this study is to assess whether combined anti-programmed-cell-death-1 (anti-PD-1) therapy and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) improves outcomes in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma in oligoprogression to anti-PD-1.

Methods

This prospective study from 4 hospitals in Spain included patients with metastatic NSCLC or melanoma who were in confirmed progression to anti-PD-1 but maintained the same line due to clinical benefit. All patients were referred for palliative SABR. Prior to SABR, we selected 1-5 measurable lesions for treatment and, if applicable, up to 2 non-target lesions outside of the planned radiation field to evaluate the abscopal response (AR). SABR was administered in 5 non-consecutive fractions (3 in case of dose-limiting constraints). Anti-PD-1 was administered concurrently and continued until progression and loss of clinical benefit or in the event of limiting toxicities. Response was assessed by RECIST 1.1 The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), local control (LC), acute toxicity (CTCAE v.4.3), time to new systemic treatment and AR.

Results

We enrolled 61 patients from September 2017 to August 2020. Of those, 50 fulfilled the study criteria for follow-up and could be included for analysis. These had a median age of 64 (range 39-87) and were in progression to nivolumab (n=23) or pembrolizumab (n =27). With a median follow-up of 33 months (range 5-45), ORR was 42% (15 complete and 6 partial responses). Median PFS was 14.2 months (95% CI, 6.9 – 29) and median OS was 37.4 months (95% CI, 22.9 – not reached). LC was 84%. Toxicity rates were similar before and after SABR. Patients maintained the same anti-PD-1 for a median of 11 months post-SABR (range 1–45). AR was measurable in 40/50 patients. Of these, 26 (65%) presented AR at 2 months.

Conclusions

In patients with stage IV NSCLC and melanoma which become unresponsive to anti-PD-1, SABR to oligoprogressive sites can unleash immune-related systemic effects that improve disease control and delay further progression, allowing for the continuation of anti-PD-1.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

D. Rodriguez: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: F. Hoffmann-La Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: F. Hoffmann-La Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.