Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1350P - Characteristics, treatment patterns and outcome of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients presenting with brain-only metastatic disease

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Amir Sabouhanian

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S949-S1039. 10.1016/annonc/annonc729

Authors

A. Sabouhanian1, S. Schmid2, M. Garcia2, L. Zhan2, S. Cheng2, K. Khan2, M.T. Chowdhury1, J. Herman1, P. Walia1, E. Strom1, M..C. Brown2, D. Patel2, W. Xu2, F.A. Shepherd2, A. Sacher2, N. Leighl2, P. Bradbury2, G. Liu2, D. Shultz3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medicine, University of Toronto - St. George Campus, M5S 3H7 - Toronto/CA
  • 2 Division Of Medical Oncology And Haematology, UHN - University Health Network - Princess Margaret Cancer Center, M5G 2M9 - Toronto/CA
  • 3 Department Of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, M5G 2C1 - Toronto/CA

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1350P

Background

In NSCLC patients, confirmation of both brain and systemic (BS-cohort) metastasis (mets) at de novo or recurrent stage IV is associated with a poor prognosis. We compared a BS-cohort to brain-only (B) and systemic-disease-only (S) cohorts.

Methods

Clinico-demographic, treatment and survival data were collected retrospectively and analyzed for all patients with met NSCLC diagnosed between Jan 1, 2014 and Dec 31, 2016, seen at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre.

Results

B-cohort patients had a median overall survival (OS) of 18.4 months compared to 11.1 months in BS-cohort and 14.1 months in S-cohort (p=0.007). OS was superior in the sub-cohort of patients presenting with de novo stage IV compared to met recurrence in the B-cohort (21.5 vs 10.2 months respectively; aHR : 2.00 (95%CI 1.19-3.37, p≤0.01)); no corresponding differences were seen within the other two cohorts. 80% of B-cohort patients received upfront local brain treatment, 45% of whom also received systemic treatment, while 6 patients were treated systemically alone. In the 87 patients with de novo stage IV, OS was superior in 24% who had local treatment to both the primary tumor and brain mets compared to patients treated for brain mets alone. This association was significant when adjusting for sex, age and histology/mutational status; aHR : 0.17 (95%CI 0.05-0.53, p=0.002).

Table: 1350P

Cohort n (%) Median age (years) Female gender Ethnicity Never-smokers Adenocarcinoma morphology De novo Stage IV EGFR+ ALK+
B 120 (12%) 67 52% 69% white; 24% Asian 27% 77% 72% 24% 4%
BS 226 (23%) 66 50% 57% white; 30% Asian 34% 86% 92% 33% 4%
S 636 (65%) 69 42% 65% white; 21% Asian 26% 72% 74% 19% 5%

Conclusions

Stage IV NSCLC patients with brain-only mets had superior OS compared to patients with systemic-only mets. In the B-cohort, de novo Stage IV patients had superior OS compared to recurrent patients. In the de novo B-cohort patients, treating both the primary tumor and brain mets correlated with a trend towards improved OS.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

University of Toronto.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.