Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

174P - Better survival associated with successful vitamin D supplementation in non-metastatic breast cancer survivors

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Presenters

Elif Isbilen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S407-S446. 10.1016/annonc/annonc687

Authors

E. Isbilen1, T. Kus2, H. Yesil Cinkir3, G. Aktas4, A. Buyukbebeci1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Biochemistry, Gaziantep University School of Medicine, 27310 - Gaziantep/TR
  • 2 Medical Oncology Department, Gaziantep University Onkoloji Hastanesi, 27100 - Gaziantep/TR
  • 3 Medical Oncology Department, Gaziantep University School of Medicine, 27310 - gaziantep/TR
  • 4 Medical Oncology Department, MedikalPark Gaziantep Hospital, 27000 - Gaziantep/TR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 174P

Background

Vitamin D deficiency is associated with various types of cancer, including breast cancer (BC), therefore interest has been increasing in recent years to address the role of vitamin D supplementation in cancer. Thus, we aimed to clarify whether successful vitamin D supplementation could predict improved survival in BC survivors after completion of adjuvant treatment.

Methods

BC survivors who completed primary treatment for early stage BC were enrolled in the study. Patients’ clinical features were recorded as follow: age, menopausal status, tumor features, including luminal types, pathological subtypes, and stage. Initial vitamin D levels of the patients and the median value of vitamin D after supplementation for patients who have insufficient vitamin D were noted. The patients were evaluated under four groups according to the vitamin D value at baseline and during follow-up. Log-rank statistics were used to compare survival distributions among groups.

Results

In total, 635 patients were analyzed in this retrospective study. 123 patients (19.4%) had sufficient vitamin D levels at baseline (group 1). 512 patients (80.6%) had insufficient vitamin D levels; 225 patients (35.4%) reached sufficient vitamin D values after supplementation (group 3), 287 patients (45.2%) had remained in insufficient levels at follow up (group 2). While stage and vitamin D groups were independently prognostic for disease free survival (DFS), pre-perimenopausal status, triple-negative disease and vitamin D groups (for group 2) were independent prognostic for overall survival (OS).

Conclusions

Vitamin D suplementation provide better DFS and OS for patients who have initially insufficient vitamin D. Even vitamin D supplementation, insufficient levels of vitamin D at follow up is still poor prognostic.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Elif Isbilen.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.