Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

844P - Barriers to treatment for patients with lymphoma across Europe: Upper middle income versus high income countries

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Bioethical Principles and GCP;  Patient Education and Advocacy

Tumour Site

Lymphomas

Presenters

Olufunmilayo Bamigbola

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S773-S785. 10.1016/annonc/annonc676

Authors

O. Bamigbola, N. Dren, L. Warwick

Author affiliations

  • Research, Lymphoma Coalition - Head Office, L5G 2T4 - Mississauga/CA

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 844P

Background

Despite development of novel treatments and updated guidelines in lymphoma care, inequities in access to care across economies remains a global challenge. This study uses the Lymphoma Coalition (LC) 2020 Global Patient Survey (GPS) on Lymphomas and CLL to examine the differences in barriers to treatment for patients with lymphoma in Europe by country income groups.

Methods

4343 patients from 37 European countries took part in the LC 2020 GPS. These countries were grouped according to the World Bank country classification by income and fell into two categories: Upper Middle-Income Countries (UMIC) (n=230) and High-Income Countries (HIC) (n=4113) groups. The demographics of the groups were examined, and univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses of questions relating to barriers to receiving treatment and healthcare financing of common lymphoma treatments were performed in IBM SPSS v27.

Results

Table: 844P

Barriers to receiving treatment by European country income groups

Barriers UMIC Count (%)* HIC Count (%)* Adjusted OR (95%CI) ** P value
None 98 (75%) 2164 (89%) 2.90 (1.83-4.61) p<0.01
Financial barriers 10 (7%) 40 (2%) 0.36 (0.16-0.78) p=0.01
Difficulty accessing up-to date treatment 11 (8%) 58 (2%) 0.24 (0.11-0.53) p<0.01
Long treatment waiting time 11 (8%) 60 (2%) 0.25 (0.12-0.53) p<0.01

∗Valid percentages used, ∗∗Adjusted for age, lymphoma subtype and area lived in, ∗∗Reference category- UMIC

Patients from HIC were more likely than UMIC patients to report experiencing no treatment barriers but were less likely to report experiencing financial difficulties, difficulty accessing up-to-date treatments and long treatment waiting time (Table). When asked how their treatment was paid for, HIC patients who had been treated or who were currently being treated for lymphoma with either chemoimmunotherapy or chemotherapy alone or immunotherapy alone were 2.3 times more likely than patients from UMIC to have had their treatment paid in full by government or insurance than to have paid for it partially out-of-pocket (95% CI-1.32-4.09), p=0.004.

Conclusions

The results show that patients with lymphoma differ in how they experience ‘barriers to care’ across country income classification in Europe. Lymphoma Coalition advocates that more effort should be put into ensuring equitable access to lymphoma care across European countries.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Lymphoma Coalition.

Funding

Pfizer Inc, AbbVie Corporation, and Takeda Oncology.

Disclosure

O. Bamigbola, N. Dren, L. Warwick: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Pfizer Inc; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AbbVie Corporation; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Takeda Oncology.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.