Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

136P - Assessment of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection on long-term survival in breast cancer patients with pathologically negative lymph node

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Surgical Oncology

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Shusen Wang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S407-S446. 10.1016/annonc/annonc687

Authors

S. Wang1, Q. Zheng1, H. Luo2, W. Xia1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060 - Guangzhou/CN
  • 2 Department Of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060 - Guangzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 136P

Background

Clinical trials suggested that sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) alone provided non-inferior survival than further axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) among breast cancer patients with negative SLNs. However, the long-term outcomes of these two surgical approaches in breast cancer patients with pathologically negative lymph nodes (pN0) remain uncertain.

Methods

We performed a population-based study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18-registry database. We included patients who received a diagnosis between 2000 and 2015 of pathological stage T1-2N0M0 breast cancer and adopted a breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. Patients were considered to have undergone an SLNB alone if they had ≤ 5 examined lymph nodes (ELNs), and ALND if they had ≥ 10 ELNs, while others were excluded given an equivocate lymph node surgery approach. Outcomes included overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Propensity-score analyses by weighting and matching and multivariable Cox regression were performed to minimize treatment selection bias.

Results

We included 309430 patients, 253501 (81.9%) underwent SLNB and 55929 (18.1%) underwent ALND. The median follow-up time in the weighted cohort was 122 months for SLNB group and 119 months for ALND group, respectively. ALND was associated with significantly lower OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.16; 10-year OS, 78.2%; 95% CI, 77.8%-78.6%) and lower BCSS (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.22; 10-year BCSS, 93.4%; 95% CI, 93.1%-93.6%) compared with SLNB alone (10-year OS, 80.4%; 95% CI, 80.2%-80.6%; 10-year BCSS, 94.2%; 95% CI, 94.1%-94.3%). Both the propensity score-matching model and multivariable Cox model demonstrated a survival benefit for SLNB group compared with ALND group. Subgroup analyses for key variables did not change these findings.

Conclusions

SLNB was associated with a significantly lower risk of death than ALND in breast cancer patients with pN0 disease. Our study first provides evidence of survival benefit, supporting that SLNB alone is a better option for patients with no metastatic lymph nodes identified after breast cancer operation.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Shusen Wang.

Funding

The National Natural Science Funds of China.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.