Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1733P - Analysis of chemotherapy (Ct) efficacy according to histology in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients (p)

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Mesothelioma

Presenters

Susana Cedres

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S1199-S1204. 10.1016/annonc/annonc730

Authors

S. Cedres1, J.D. Assaf1, P. Iranzo Gomez1, A. Callejo Perez1, N. Pardo Aranda1, A. Navarro1, A. Martinez-Marti1, D.H. Marmolejo Castaneda1, M.A. Rezqallah Aron1, A. Pedrola1, J. Gonzalo1, J. Frigola2, C. Carbonell2, R. Amat2, R. Dienstmann3, E. Felip4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Dept., Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 8035 - Barcelona/ES
  • 2 Thoracic Tumors & Head And Neck Cancer Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO)-Cellex Center, 8035 - Barcelona/ES
  • 3 Oncology Data Science Department, Grupo Oncoclinicas, 04543-906 - Sao Paulo/BR
  • 4 Medical Oncology Service (lung Cancer Unit)  , Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 08035 - Barcelona/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1733P

Background

MPM is a highly aggressive pleural tumor with limited survival. CheckMate-743 trial demonstrated survival benefit of immunotherapy over Ct in 1st line with some differences in the efficacy of Ct according to histology. However, randomized trials who led to the approval of antifolate in MPM did not include analysis of outcomes by histology. The objective of this study is to characterize the impact of Ct according to histology in p with MPM.

Methods

Clinical records of MPM diagnosed at Vall d´Hebron University Hospital between November 2002 and April 2020 were reviewed. Associations between clinical variables and outcome were assessed with Cox regression models and survival data were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

189 p were included. P’s characteristics: median age 68 years (y) (45-88 y), males: 70%, performance status (PS)1: 69%, epithelioid: 76%. First line Ct was offered to 85% of p (66% cisplatin and 27% carboplatin). Median overall survival (OS) was 21.3 m (95%CI17.2-24.3). Epithelioid histology, PS 0, and treatment with cisplatin vs carboplatin were associated with significant improvements in OS (p<0.001). Median PFS for p with epithelioid tumors treated with Ct in 1st line was 4.8 m versus 3.6 months non-epithelioid (HR1.5 CI95% 1.1-2.3; p=0.03). OS of epithelioid p treated with 1st line Ct was 26.7 m versus 15.0 m non-epithelioid patients (HR2.25 CI95% 1.4-3.4; p<0.001). The improvement of outcomes in patients with epithelioid histology was detected in patients treated with cisplatin or carboplatin. Histology was not a predictive factor for the platinum agent sensitivity (p of interaction PFS=0.09, p of interaction OS=0.65) (Table). Table: 1733P

PFS OS
Overall Cisplatin Carboplatin Overall Cisplatin Carboplatin
Epithelioid 4.8 5.1 4.5 26.7 30.7 26.7
Non-epithelioid 3.6 3.6 3.6 15.0 17.2 14.8
HR 1.5 CI95% 1.1-2.3; p=0.03 HR 1.4 CI95% 0.91-2.3; p=0.06 HR 1.99 CI95% 0.96-4.1; p=0.06 HR 2.25 CI95% 1.4-3.4; p<0.001 HR 2.7 CI95% 1.6-4.5; p<0.001 HR 2.7 CI95% 1.3-5.8; p=0.008

Conclusions

In our series, patients with nonepithelioid tumors presented worse prognosis. Although epithelioid tumors exposed to cisplatin had higher PFS, histology was not a clear predictor of Ct efficacy.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

S. Cedres: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Amphera; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche. P. Iranzo Gomez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Rovi; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Kyowa. A. Callejo Perez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Kyowa. N. Pardo Aranda: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim. A. Navarro: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Oryzon. A. Martinez-Marti: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: MSD. E. Felip: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AbbVie; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: BerGenBio; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Beigene; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Bayer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Blueprint; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Eli Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Glaxo; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Guardant Health; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Medscape; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: priME; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Samsung; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Grifols; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.