Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1374P - A randomized phase III study to compare efficacy and safety between combination therapy and monotherapy as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer (KCSG ST13-10)

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer

Presenters

Insil Choi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S1040-S1075. 10.1016/annonc/annonc708

Authors

I. Choi1, K. Lee2, D.Y. Zang3, M.H. Ryu4, H.S. Han5, K.H. Kim6, M. Kim7, S.A. Koh8, S.S. Lee9, D. Koo10, Y.H. Ko11, B.S. Sohn12, J.H. Park1, J.W. Kim2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 07061 - Seoul/KR
  • 2 Department Of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 13620 - Seongnam/KR
  • 3 Department Of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 14068 - Anyang/KR
  • 4 Department Of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 138-931 - Seoul/KR
  • 5 Department Of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, 28644 - Cheongju/KR
  • 6 Department Of Internal Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, 47392 - Busan/KR
  • 7 Center For Gastric Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, 10408 - Goyang/KR
  • 8 Department Of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, 42415 - Daegu/KR
  • 9 Department Of Hematology-oncology, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, 48108 - Busan/KR
  • 10 Department Of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 03181 - Seoul/KR
  • 11 Department Of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Eunpyeong St.Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 03312 - Seoul/KR
  • 12 Department Of Internal Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, 01757 - Seoul/KR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1374P

Background

This phase III study evaluated whether combination therapy has superior efficacy to monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Methods

Elderly (≥ 70 years) chemo-naïve patients were randomly assigned to receive either combination therapy (arm A: capecitabine/cisplatin, capecitabine/oxaliplatin, S-1/cisplatin, or 5-FU/oxaliplatin) or monotherapy (arm B; capecitabine, S-1, or 5-FU). Randomization was stratified by age (< 75; ≥ 75 years), ECOG performance status (0,1; 2), and fluoropyrimidine backbone (capecitabine; S-1; 5-FU). Starting doses were 80% of standard doses in the arm A, with discretionary escalation to full dose after 1 cycle. The primary objective was to confirm superior overall survival (OS) of combination therapy to monotherapy.

Results

After 111 of the 238 patients planned were enrolled, this study was terminated due to poor accrual. In the full-analysis population, with a median follow up of 9.5 months (range, 0.3-71.2), median OS for combination versus monotherapy was 11.5 versus 7.5 months (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-1.30, P=0.2308). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 versus 3.7 months (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.83, P = 0.0046). In a subgroup analysis, patients with 70-74 years tended to have superior OS with combination versus monotherapy (15.9 versus 7.2 months [HR=0.53, 95% CI 0.28-1.03, P =0.056]). Treatment-related adverse events (all grades) occurred more frequently in the arm A versus arm B: neutropenia (43.4% versus 21.6%), thrombocytopenia (41.5% versus 19.6%), fatigue (47.2% versus 27.5%), diarrhea (22.6% versus 11.8%), and vomiting (15.1% versus 9.8%). Common grade 3/4 adverse events were anemia (11.3%) and nausea (5.7%) in the arm A, and anemia (7.8%) and hyponatremia (3.9%) in the arm B.

Conclusions

Combination therapy did not show superiority for OS, but had significant PFS benefit versus monotherapy in the first-line treatment of elderly patients with AGC. Combination therapy was well tolerated, though frequent adverse events occurred. Patients with 70-74 years would benefit more from combination therapy.

Clinical trial identification

NCT02114359.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

National R & D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry for Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (132054).

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.